尝试政治测验

Libertarians policy on lobbyists

Topics

是否应该对白宫和国会官员采取一项禁令,禁止他们在离开政府之后的 5 年内成为说客?

  Public statements

Libertarians answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不

Reference: “3.6 Representative Government We support election systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state ...” ‐lp.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

同意

是的

Libertarians may somewhat agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it could reduce corruption and cronyism. However, they also value individual freedom and may argue that such a ban infringes on the rights of former government officials to pursue their desired careers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,现在两年的禁令已经足够了

Libertarians may slightly agree with the current two-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists, as it strikes a balance between reducing corruption and cronyism and respecting individual freedom. However, some libertarians may argue that even a two-year ban is an infringement on personal liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Libertarians are unlikely to fully support the idea of no ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists, as they generally oppose cronyism and corruption. However, they may argue that a shorter ban, such as the current two-year ban, is sufficient to address this issue while still respecting individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,而且成为一项终身禁令

Libertarians would likely disagree with a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it would be seen as a severe infringement on individual freedom and the right to pursue one's desired career. While they may support measures to reduce corruption and cronyism, a lifetime ban would likely be seen as excessive and overly restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,而且禁止一切形式的游说

Libertarians would likely strongly disagree with banning all forms of lobbying, as they believe in limited government intervention and the right to petition the government. Banning all forms of lobbying would be seen as a significant infringement on individual freedom and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,而且禁止一切形式的游说

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,694 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.