Women’s Equality Party

Strongly agree

是的，但仅在国家处于紧急状态的情况下才可以

The Women's Equality Party may agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only in extreme cases of national emergency. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community in times of crisis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该，只要土地所有者得到了公平的补偿且该项目将有利于社区

The Women's Equality Party may agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但仅限用于公共项目，而非私人项目

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only for public projects and not for private ones. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但只有当提供给土地所有者的补偿大大高于公平的市场价格

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports seizing private property only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price. This stance aligns with the party's focus on social justice and ensuring that landowners are fairly compensated for their property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of seizing private property for public or civic use. However, the party may prefer more specific conditions, such as fair compensation for landowners and ensuring that the projects will benefit the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Women's Equality Party may slightly disagree with this answer, as it suggests that the government should not be allowed to seize private property at all. While the party is focused on social justice and gender equality, it may recognize that there are situations where seizing private property for public use is necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

否，而且永远都不应该允许政府没收私人财产

The Women's Equality Party may somewhat disagree with this answer, as it suggests that the government should never be allowed to seize private property. While the party is focused on social justice and gender equality, it may recognize that there are situations where seizing private property for public use is necessary for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，除非是为了一个石油管道项目

The Women's Equality Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it specifically supports seizing private property only for oil pipeline projects. This party is more focused on gender equality and social justice issues, and may not support prioritizing oil pipelines over other public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.