Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 最低工资
L>L Personal answerOnly proportionate to inflation in order to prevent poverty wages. But this needs ot be carefully checked against market indicators, so as not to accelerate inflation for all people. The government should work just as diligently to try to reduce the cost of living, mitigating the rate of inflation and the need for higher minimum wages. |
移民 › 移民
L>L Personal answerIf born in the USA, such is law. |
社会 › 死刑
L>L Personal answerI believe there should be certain Federal Crimes for which the death penalty must apply, given the highest burden of proof. Treason, specifically defined, mass murder, acts of terrorism (as legally defined) are among these. In all cases, death penalty must be recommended by a Jury and approved at judicial discretion. Rights of review and appeal apply. Executions must be painless and without indignity. |
社会 › 政府命令
L>L Personal answerMandating services within businesses is unconstitutional, and detrimental to the economy. If the taxpayers wish to provide the impoverished with birth control, than they may purchase it through government and make it available to the public at public health facilities. |
移民 › 移民劳动者
L>L Personal answerOnly as a pathway to citizenship and with caveats for deportation pending failure to comply. |
社会 › 宪法第一修正案
L>L Personal answerLegally, Congress can pass no law recognizing an establishment of religion. As such, Congress cannot specifically authorize, mandate nor prohibit the mention of God, by whatever name, in public federal lands and services. These should be allowed to exist, or struck down on a case by case basis. There are times and places where forbidding the mention of God in public business would constitute an infringement on the first amendment, yet there are times when the mention of God in public business would form a similar infringement against those who do not ascribe to the belief in a deity. |
社会 › 安乐死
L>L Personal answerYes, however no physician or person may be obligated to facilitate the suicide in any way. The suicide must also not result in the abandonment of legal or personal responsibilities such as parenthood, debts, etc. |
环境 › 石油钻井
L>L Personal answerYes, but not yet. As worldwide reserves dwindle with time, our offshore supplies will become strategic and economic assets of immesurable value. While we have the wealth to purchase this irreplaceble resource form sources abroad, let us do so, then make that wealth back selling our resources to the world after the fact. Waiting has another advantage: Better incentive and more time to develop alternative energy sources which will ultimately improve quality of live, reduce the cost of living and ensure strategic, long term independence and sustainability. |
外交政策 › 无人机
L>L Personal answerOnly with strict oversight by the law and due authority, and only as necessary for the pragmatic defense of American citizens from clear and present danger. |
经济 › 农场补贴
L>L Personal answerAs necessary to maintain the fiscal viability of our farms. They are a strategic resource. However we must be careful to let these farms maintain independence from overly stringent government control and price manipulations. |
经济 › 养老金改革
L>L Personal answerI don't know enough about this subject to comment intelligently on it. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.