No

Health care is made up by taxes, therefore single payer healthcare is much harder to maintain because you pay the taxes individually and may not get money back for claiming people on your tax return and tax rate.

Abolishing patent monopolies would have the same effect of making it more affordable without government inefficiency shown by other countries with socialized medical care. U.S is pretty high in cancer survival rate already too.

Long wait times for specialized care and elective procedures, potential for reduced innovation, and limited patient choice regarding providers.

Thomas Sowell put it best: "It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it"

Critics of a single-payer healthcare system argue that it could create more problems than it solves, especially in a country like the United States, which already spends about 17–18% of its GDP on healthcare—more than any other developed nation. They point out that replacing private insurance with a government-run system would likely require major tax increases, which could simply shift costs rather than reduce them. Evidence from countries with similar systems, such as Canada and the United Kingdom, also shows that while coverage is more universal, patients often experience longe…  Read morer wait times for non-emergency procedures due to increased demand and limited resources. Opponents also argue that a single-payer model could reduce competition and innovation in healthcare and pharmaceuticals by placing more pricing control in the hands of the government. Finally, they warn that transitioning to such a system would be extremely disruptive, affecting millions of workers and fundamentally restructuring one of the largest sectors of the U.S. economy.