Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
County:
@9FYQH32Progressive 3yrs3Y
Increased investment in public transportation will get Americans to work, to education, and to healthcare, and it will also get our nation to more job creation, less traffic congestion and cleaner air.
@9FW9S29Progressive 3yrs3Y
Public transportation is much more efficient in carrying people than private transportation. Much of public transit throughout America is under-funded and therefore lacks quality service. If public transit was invested more, there would be more job opportunities and improved access to amenities. Only funding private transportation will only encourage private transportation, making there be even more private vehicles on the road, causing road congestion. Public transportation improves community health, brings economic benefits to the community, improves fuel efficiency, reduces air pollution, improves road congestion, improves community mobility, and provides an equitable transportation system. Therefore, it is essential that efficient and sufficient transportation is funded properly.
@98HRPKD3yrs3Y
@PATdirk 3yrs3Y
Public transportation hardly gets any funding as it is and it would be beneficial to peoples health and an efficient way of making both long and short distance trips
@9GJWZ93 3yrs3Y
Absolutely, and there is no possible way to get to most places outside large cities. There should be more public transit access within and between cities and towns, but also a cross-country high speed rail system, like the ones already implemented in Europe and other parts of the world. It would increase people's travel, strengthen the economy, and allow more national unity.
@9GJVVD73yrs3Y
@9GKFN65 3yrs3Y
The most socially conscious of urban planners would agree that good public transportation is a must for a good city. Our urban centers rely too heavily on cars which leads to more environments getting taken over by roads, congested traffic, and over less convenience for average people. We need more buses, more subways, and more trains. There needs to be more space for people to just walk, not everything has to be made to accommodate cars.
@9GL5PSC 3yrs3Y
I definitely agree. I feel that there are too many vehicles out on the road today. I went to Germany a few months ago, and in the town center, there was nothing but stores, open space, and a tram line. There was a circle in the center lined by fountains, and there were plenty of setting areas. The place was beautiful. We don't have anything like that in the U.S. I wish there were, though, because a few of my friends and I went to hang out, which was very relaxing. The experience was indescribable. I wish there were these spaces in the U.S.
@9GKY36H 3yrs3Y
Public transportation, especially carbon neutral public transportation is the best way to fight climate while also allowing the Internal Combustion Engine to stay alive. Not everyone wants to drive a boring electric vehicle. The government has no right to keep us from buying a car that we enjoy driving, which means an actual engine and maybe a manual transmission. You can't blame this shift in climate on the car alone. More industrial companies and factories should become carbon neutral, not just the car. Plus, an increase in spending on gasoline alternatives, like the synthetic fuel Porsche has been experimenting with and Hydrogen power is also a great compromise.
@9GM2YHQIndependent3yrs3Y
@9GJZRDY3yrs3Y
@9FLLR33Independent3yrs3Y
@9GHM8CQ 3yrs3Y
Most spending that people think is allocated to Public Transportation is used to refurbish and build new highways. A small portion is used for buses, trains, and light railways, so more should be used for these specific options.
@9GHNYP33yrs3Y
More should go to trains, light rails, and buses. As someone from the Bay Area, we have an amazing public transportation. It is mostly clean and safe as well and it pollutes a lot less. It is also faster due to traffic and allows less traffic on the freeway. And for many, it is a much more affordable option than driving a car.
@9GHNCFPConstitution3yrs3Y
@9GHNCLV3yrs3Y
@9GRMBW5Libertarian3yrs3Y
@9GT26YN3yrs3Y
@9FSZHRR3yrs3Y
Better public transportation services help everyone by increasing job opportunities and incentivizing economic development. Our current car-centric transportation infrastructure will be unsustainable in the long run. Increasing funding for public transportation will reduce car traffic and improve air quality, too.
@9GTY9RY3yrs3Y
@9GT3PNT3yrs3Y
@9GRZ2WVIndependent3yrs3Y
@9FS7CL23yrs3Y
Car-centric infrastructure won't be sustainable for the environment in the long run. We are behind most developed country's in access to quality public transportation. Cars should not be a necessity for Americans, as there are some Americans who aren't financially well enough to afford and maintain a car.
@9GSDQNB3yrs3Y
A large part of the reason China has seen such a large economic boom is the ability of citizens to easily move within their borders. Working in a different city is possible with fast and well regulated transportation and can increase job opportunities and economic advantages for many cities and towns. It can help decrease traffic congestion on roads in large metro areas as well as lowering our carbon footprint. It can save Americans thousands of dollars a year on car maintenance and repairs. The list goes on and
@9FQJPXP3yrs3Y
The United States is a country built on driving. Cars are a major expense for most people. They are also extremely loud and bad for the environment, and dangerous for kids. Good Public Transportation, even if paid for by taxes, would limit the necessity of a car and lower people's costs. It would also make cities quieter and safer.
@9FRGZBV3yrs3Y
@9GS46823yrs3Y
@9FL2JLG3yrs3Y
@9GSRPTF3yrs3Y
The people who live in areas or are in situations that make it difficult for them to own a car or other form of transportation struggle to get to work. Those people should have a way to make an income. Plus looking at other countries that have better public transportation all over, have better lives. There are also better ways to reduce carbon emissions and fossil fuels if we lean more into other ways for citizens to work.
@9GSP3SH3yrs3Y
@9GSL8RM3yrs3Y
@9FSRZYW3yrs3Y
@9FMNKC43yrs3Y
@9FQZSZVIndependent3yrs3Y
@9FLLQKY3yrs3Y
@9GDTWP33yrs3Y
Public transportation is a widely used form of transportation as a lot of people may not have a license or have access to a car. Increasing spending on public transportation can help reduce traffic congestion as there would be fewer cars on the road. There are also possible environmental benefits as newer models of busses run on electricity rather than gasoline or diesel.
@9GGLJTC3yrs3Y
Public transportation is a solution to many problems that exist in the modern world. Not only can it help cut down emission rates, but also provides an affordable way of transportation for those who cannot afford a private vehicle. It can also limit automobile accidents by making sure the operators are educated and licensed.
@9FQPRPG3yrs3Y
I could go on about this for hours. Well funded public transport is more efficient, gives people more options than forcing people to spend thousands on buying and maintaining a car, is better for the environment, reduces traffic related mortalities, road rage, and car accidents, lets people relax while traveling instead of being stressed while driving, encourages transit-oriented walkable communities which in turn bring people closer together in their own communities, and increases tax revenue for the city since businesses in walkable areas are more densely packed together.
@9FNN2CZ3yrs3Y
@9FL987C3yrs3Y
An increase of government funds for public transportation would be a boon for many Americans, as they would have access to cheaper transportation, reducing the need for cars, repairs, gas, or any related cost. It would also reduce carbon emissions and decrease traffic, saving our planet and time out of a commute.
@9GXCJ7M3yrs3Y
There are people who can't pay bills or can't vote, or many other problems because of transportation problems and that could be made easier with money for transportation. There are also a lot of kids who don't have a ride to somewhere and money towards transportation could fix this or make it less of a problem.
@9FT278ZConstitution3yrs3Y
@9FLBYNW3yrs3Y
@9FNZN4X3yrs3Y
@9FLCLTL3yrs3Y
@9FPNWZP3yrs3Y
@9FNYPVN3yrs3Y
@9FMKPFD3yrs3Y
@9G8B87H3yrs3Y
@9GGYSRT3yrs3Y
@9GYS42P3yrs3Y
we should increase it to decrease our global footprint and but things like a more efficient national railway system to make travel times fast
@9GYSCPV3yrs3Y
@9GCR82Q3yrs3Y
@9GF7YR5Independent3yrs3Y
Public transit is a very nice thing to have when it is of high quality and high efficiency. The US is way behind other countries especially when it comes to high speed rails, specifically. I believe public transportation is viewed as a solution only to be use by lower class individuals. I think that with more investment this stigma could be changed and public transit could reach a broader market and provide benefits to more people.
@9GF5CV43yrs3Y
@9G8NZDT3yrs3Y
@9G7Z68Q3yrs3Y
@9GG6KW53yrs3Y
@9GHDPTH3yrs3Y
Most places in the US require a car to get around and people should not have to pay to buy and maintain a car just to live. It would be much simpler for high-population areas to use primarily public transport like the subway. Obviously, a car is a necessity in more rural areas, but a much smaller percentage of the population would require a car.
@9GXH8LD3yrs3Y
@9FLF4L23yrs3Y
@9FWB96Y3yrs3Y
Public transportation is an extremely important asset. In addition to providing an essential service for Americans without cars, it is also a good solution for reducing emissions for global warming.
@98HRPKD3yrs3Y
@9GY9YVZ3yrs3Y
@9FT6JH73yrs3Y
@9GYPDRS3yrs3Y
@9GXQ6Z3Progressive3yrs3Y
@9FTSX5G3yrs3Y
@9FLBD973yrs3Y
@9GYMKRB3yrs3Y
@9H3NBF3Independent3yrs3Y
@9FL2P6MProgressive3yrs3Y
Our current infrastructure is very much car-centric, and the vast majority of public transport are getting old and requiring more and more maintenance. If we reduce our already low public transit spending, those who are either incapable of using a car or are unable to afford one will no longer have even an ineffective means of transportation.
@9GP7FNV3yrs3Y
@9FSSFKR3yrs3Y
@9GS26843yrs3Y
Removed by author3yrs3Y
Public Transportation is a better option compared to driving, as travel times tend to be shorter, obesity rates drop as people are sitting less, and walking more, and carbon emissions in areas with properly funded Public Transportation with good coverage and good accessibility to those walking or biking decrease.
@9GFYNG83yrs3Y
@9G69TFB3yrs3Y
@9GF6R743yrs3Y
My counter-argument is that in a large, urban population, there are many people who can't afford a car or other transportation, or just can't get around, that would be devastated by funding cuts.
@9GFHN2Z3yrs3Y
@9GHQJMP3yrs3Y
@9G3QZHKProgressive3yrs3Y
@9G2MZP23yrs3Y
The modern American infrastructure has ruined open cities, to the point where even biking is difficult. If we are to increase spending on public transportation, then we could make transportation fees cheaper for everyone through subways and more eco-friendly bike routes. There are so many untapped benefits for the American population if we stop relying on individual motor vehicles so much.
@9GCYRZJ3yrs3Y
@9GWKF48Progressive3yrs3Y
@9GW4SDV3yrs3Y
@B6XQ8SW10mos10MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.