Should the U.S. and NATO use military forces to defend Ukraine from a Russian invasion?

No

Only when Russia attacks a NATO member

No, but the Russian invasion should be opposed with tough sanctions and US troops should be increased to bordering NATO countries.

Yes, in the form of supplying the Ukraine with jet fighters, missiles and air defense systems but not deploying our troops

They should provide financial support, but only engage as a last resort

No, unless attacked first.

No, the government should help by sanctioning the Russian oligarchs and cancel all of Ukraine's debt.

No, We cannot interfere until Russia invades on NATO land; however, we should give supplies and financial aid to Ukraine

No, Ukraine is not a NATO ally and we should not directly send troops, but continuing to condemn Russia and send military equipment is right

If Ukraine is in NATO then yes, if not we should stay out of it.

No, Russia in the long run will lose the war due to the unpopularity of the war, and tolls it has taken on the world as a whole.

No, but we should organize a humanitarian effort like the Berlin airlift in order to relieve the innocent citizens of Ukraine and continue to sanction Russia. Only if Russia attacks a NATO country or a humanitarian convoy should we take an active defense.

Yes, in the form of supplying the Ukraine with jet fighters, weapons and air defense systems but not deploying our troops

No, but it should send weapons, intelligence, and financial assistance

No, and withdraw from NATO

No, but support Ukraine and sanction Russia. Troops on the ground should be a last resort

No, Ukraine should defend themselves and we should only focus on diplomatic resolutions

I believe it is Ukraine's decision if they want the US & NATO to help Ukraine.

Yes. They may not be a member of NATO, but they should be free to choose their own future. Just because they can join, does not mean they will be given membership.

Yes as long as Ukraine doesn't try to attack us

Provide almost any other alternative and only proceed with military action when deemed necessary.

No, and abolish NATO. It is obsolete and we should be focusing on our own borders anyway.

No, provide them with force fighter jets, ships and air defense systems but do not deploy our troops

Yes, but in the form of providing them with force fighter jets, ships and air defense systems

No, but continue to supply Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves and provide humanitarian aid

Yes, but only through supplying Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves and providing humanitarian aid

Yes, order a number of our troops to be on standby in Europe and continue to supply Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves

No, but continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves

No, but they should diplomatically work to bring about peace in the conflict

No, unless American lives are threatened and military force is necessary to rescue them.

No, the United States should not be involved into another war that results in casualties.

Europe should be allowed to deal with internal problems until it affects America

Yes and we should strike china too

while military force should be ready, more diplomatic ways should be implemented

We should help our allies

only if ukraine requests foreign aid

Depends on our involvement with Russia and Ukraine

yes, without adding more conflict and acting ace a peaceful barrier between the two

Yes, but only if Ukraine joins NATO after the conflict

No unless they commit a war crime

we should all just get along and stop causing war and dumb fights and just be a good happy healthy country and make sure our people are all safe and make sure our counrty is runing right instead of fighting against each other.

Yes, but NATO should provide equal support as America.

Use sanctions, and impose punishment on Russia, if it invaded Ukraine

Yes

No, it could spark nuclear war.

I think we should help them but if we get involved, we get dragged into that war and soon enough we would have world war 3.

Send military weapons over there but soldiers no

Yes, but use all diplomatic ways of dissolving tension in the region before we make it look like we're ready for a war we're not looking to start.

Yes, only if Ukraine wants it, US and NATO has tried all other option.

Yes, if Russia attacks the Baltic states.

In some ways.

Yes, If necessary

Maybe the most difficult question here. I don't have an answer.

Not military force if possible, depends on if all peaceful means are exhausted

Yes, if we have EU backing and supporting it as well.

yes, but only when it is deemed needed and they ask for help

No, but militarily defend all NATO countries from attack.

No, but send maximum material and humanitarian aid and allow Americans to volunteer with full amnesty

No, but PMCs should be used to influence outcome in favor of American interests

We should aid without military conflict.

it depends on what russian armys are doing in ukraine.

No use strong sanctions and provide aide to Ukraine.

No but we should still help just scale back a little

No, Focus on evacuating Ukrainian citizens instead.

The U.S. and NATO should defend Ukraine if Russia escalates the war by miscalculation with airstrike or use tactical to biological and chemical weapon use.

No, but military aid including offensive firepower such as long range missiles and fighter jets should be made available to Ukraine.

if it gets worse

The US should be using diplomatic measures to aid Ukraine

Not until Ukraine joins nato

No, they can help by other means such as military aid or intelligence sharing

America has no obligation to now Taiwan on there hand we might not only from the perspective that we promised to protect them via contracts but they make the chips we use for electriconics if China gets ahold of it we'd be more screwed then we are right now and we are pretty screwed for the foreseeable future which is really sad to say actually

Send military equipment, but soldiers should not be fighting Russia in an official capacity.

Send weapons but no troops

Only if Russia escalates the war by using chemical weapons or tactical nuke. Or if Russia of course launches missiles that accidentally hits NATO territory.

More info needed and money laundering investigated

We should have let them join NATO when they gave up their nukes.

Yes. Russia's aggression should not be tolerated by the U. N., much less NATO.

Yes if Ukraine joins NATO

No but continue providing military aid

Yes, but only if Russia invades any NATO country

No, nor should we defend any country other than our own.

This did not age well

No, give them weapons and humanitarian aid.

Yes, but only if NATO agrees

Provide aid, but not military intervention. I also believe that NATO should be abolished altogether, as it has become obsolete and redundant because we already have the United Nations.

I think, at this moment in time, economic intervention or aid for refugees might be better than military force as to not escalate the conflict to even more catastrophic levels.

No, we need to stay out of this before the whole country pays the price.

No, but the US and NATO should provide Ukraine with weapons and indirect support with which to defend itself from Russian invasion

Yes, but we need to be careful about not starting a much larger war

No, but all military hardware short of WMDs should be made available to Ukraine through lend-lease.

Ukraine is not in NATO

No boots on ground support but provide weapons and tech aid for defense purposes instead.

No, but the U.S. and NATO should continue providing aid to Ukraine

No, but continue support through aid and punishment of Russia

No but they should send military,economic and humanitarian aid

No, only if Russia attacks a NATO country

Yes, if it becomes necessary

No we should focus on evacuating Ukrainian citizens instead.