Try the political quiz
+

15 Replies

 @B88F9LS from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B88C5NH from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B86LW5Z from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B866TQP from New York  answered…8mos8MO

I believe that some acres are better to keep it where it is for nature to thrive, but it can be possible to give them a larger area for the olympics, it also depends.

 @B85SJSN from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B84ZTVR from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, also I think making cool new sports in forest is an awesome idea that preserves wildlife!

 @B84ZFYV from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B84QDQD from New York  answered…8mos8MO

no only yes if economically sound. you need to pay in accordance to land value

 @B83DZQ2 from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B82H9QP from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Yes but the new acres have to have trees and nature living already before the transaction

 @B829NXB from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B7ZS9WX from New York  answered…8mos8MO

 @B86YJXXRepublican from South Carolina  answered…8mos8MO

no, NY is already taking protected land away to use for solar panels

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...