Supporters say it reflects the severity of cartel threats. Opponents argue it’s symbolic and ineffective.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
County:
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@BCW52XL2mos2MO
I still agree with the Yes side because this is actually a really big problem, not something small. Cartels are behind a lot of fentanyl coming into the U.S., and that drug is killing a lot of people—like it’s one of the main causes of death for young adults right now. Even a tiny amount can kill someone, so it’s serious.
@BBD3RKGRepublican4mos4MO
@BB55WTJ4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
@BCW52XL2mos2MO
I don’t really agree with the No side because cartels already act like terrorists with how violent and controlling they are. Calling them terrorist organizations isn’t just for show—it could actually help law enforcement take them more seriously and go after them harder. Even if there might be some risks, I feel like the danger cartels bring is a bigger problem, so it makes sense to take stronger action instead of doing nothing.
@BBD3RKGRepublican4mos4MO
@BDX7W9W2wks2W
@BDQSRZR4wks4W
@BDPMTDH1mo1MO
@BC954LR3mos3MO
@BC2CW4G3mos3MO
@B9YTM9CConstitution 5mos5MO
@B927F856mos6MO
@B8LKWLQ7mos7MO
@B8L36HJ7mos7MO
@B8KWQNP7mos7MO
@B8F9SG57mos7MO
@B8D9XGK7mos7MO
@B8D6J567mos7MO
@B8D4VM27mos7MO
@B8CRYQK7mos7MO
@B8BG5DK8mos8MO
@B85PFGS8mos8MO
@B84MRC58mos8MO
@B84LTS68mos8MO
@B82TVD98mos8MO
@B7Y9G6V8mos8MO
@BD8TNYQ2mos2MO
@BCSYSL62mos2MO
@BCS3V6G2mos2MO
@BCCG8S23mos3MO
@BC95Q3H3mos3MO
@B99HTD35mos5MO
@BC7QZ9V3mos3MO
@BDRBG6C 4wks4W
@BF3BYYK4 days4D
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.