Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsBallot PropositionTransportation PolicyArizonaTaxationPrivacy RightsMileage TaxStates: Arizona•••Started 8mos agoActive 4 days ago

Should Arizona ban taxes based on miles driven?

Blocks per-mile taxes or tracking. Pro: protects privacy. Con: cuts road funding options.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Arizona?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

12 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8mos8MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8mos8MO

No

 @BCTL4Z7 from Arizona  disagreed…2mos2MO

this just adds more taxes than we already have we pay taxes for everything this is another way to put more

 @BDSVYLYNo Labels from Arizona  answered…3wks3W

Depends. Some people work truck-driving jobs and earn minimum wage, while others burn through gas like it is paper.

 @B8L2NL3 from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, Arizona can raise road fundings in other ways

 @B8CZT2S  from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only if there's a free road to the same place

 @B87QCCW from Arizona  answered…8mos8MO

No, but you could add tax discount or give back more based on miled when tax returns happen.

 @BD9R9J2 from Arizona  answered…2mos2MO

Death no government should control its citizens like this

 @B8NFWG2 from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

No, unless their job requires that person to drive.

 @B8MBQQV from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

I think that the company should pay what the average of all the drivers is

 @BDRBG6C  from Arizona  answered…4wks4W

Unneeded immoral taxes shouldnt exist.

 @BF36S47No Labels from Arizona  answered…4 days4D

Yes, but electric vehicle owners should be pay a tax that is equal to share lost.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies