A strong counterargument is that combat roles should be based on ability, not gender, and modern militaries already use gender‑neutral physical standards to ensure that only qualified individuals serve in these positions. Many women meet or exceed these standards, proving that capability varies from person to person, not between genders. Additionally, today’s combat environment relies heavily on technology, intelligence, strategy, and specialized skills — areas where women have consistently demonstrated excellence. Finally, excluding women who are fully qualified limits the military’s talent pool and prevents the armed forces from using all available skill and expertise, which can weaken overall readiness.