Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsthe EnvironmentEminent DomainProperty RightsNebraskaCarbon CaptureEthanol IndustryStates: Nebraska•••Started 4mos agoActive 6 days ago

Should private companies be granted eminent domain power to build carbon-capture pipelines across Nebraska farmland?

The proposal by companies like Summit Carbon Solutions to build pipelines across Nebraska has created a unique political rift, pitting the powerful ethanol industry against agricultural landowners and property rights activists. Proponents argue the pipelines are essential to access California's low-carbon fuel markets and save the state's corn economy. Opponents argue that private companies should not have the authority to seize land through eminent domain for a project that carries safety risks and permanent soil damage.

+
Expand

9 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

No

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

No, high-pressure CO2 pipelines are dangerous and could suffocate rural communities if they rupture.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

Yes, but only if they secure voluntary easements from a supermajority of landowners first.

 @BDZRQTCRepublican from Nebraska  answered…6 days6D

Eminent domain should be illegal

 @BCNKPCQ from Nebraska  answered…2mos2MO

No, keep the farms safe

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

No, eminent domain must be restricted to public use, not private corporate gain.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

No, carbon capture is a taxpayer-funded scam that doesn't actually help the environment.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

Yes, this infrastructure is critical to save Nebraska's ethanol industry from federal climate mandates.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...4mos4MO

Yes

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies