Try the political quiz
+

12 Replies

 @BBQZZ6L from Pennsylvania  agreed…4mos4MO

I agree that one or a group of people shouldn't be very rich if others are not doing well. However, getting rid of rich people seems like socialism. I believe we should tax them more and make sure monopolies are divided if found.

 @BBPPXG7  from Ohio  agreed…4mos4MO

I agree. I think we are so separated because of labels. It just makes it seem like people want to be seen as a higher title, which explains millionaires, billionaires, and such.

 @BBTTX4W from North Carolina  agreed…3mos3MO

I agree there shouldn't be people barely being able to afford living expenses or living paycheck to paycheck and then have people live extremely comfortably and not having to worry about anything

 @BBSHTWJ from California  agreed…4mos4MO

I agree, billionaires ARE unethical. The wealthy used to help fund projects to benefit the community and if your net worth is in the billions it's clear you're not doing that. There is no reason a single person should hoard wealth that could help millions live better lives.

 @BBSDM7P from Louisiana  agreed…4mos4MO

Indeed. They are people who are suffering and are stuck in poverty. The system was built to keep the rich 'rich/richer' and the poor 'poor'. Mainly for the P.O.C. (people of color). We need to change it complete so it can help us not mess over us.

 @BBSD9L6 from Georgia  agreed…4mos4MO

I agree, that the class gap should not be the way it is today. More people are unable to afford many basic necessities, and the rich only get richer.

 @BBSBLP4Democrat from New York  agreed…4mos4MO

I don't agree with the idea there should be no billionaires- those who put the effort without resorting to unscrupulous methods should be allowed to become a billionaire.

 @BBS73TJ  from Maine  agreed…4mos4MO

people with unjust amounts of money can be classed as more greedy because of the way they hoard without giving to people in need most of the time. Anyone who claims they do share large amounts of money may not be trusted when there is no proof and funding for important causes are declining.

 @BBS5LN7Progressive from Kansas  agreed…4mos4MO

I completely agree, billionares are already far too powerful. Their reach is infinite and all powerful, there needs to be a limit to their reach and wealth. My idea is a wealth limit, where all money obtained after reaching 1 billion dollars goes directly to government funding and charity, a hard line with no chance of exception.

 @BBS4J7X from Florida  disagreed…4mos4MO

Your money is your money no one needs to have the exact same amount of money. People who are billionaires worked for that money so they deserve it.

 @BBS3M4L from Washington  agreed…4mos4MO

I think there shouldnt be billionaires because that really effects the rest of us, billionaires could spend that money helping peole in need such as stuff like shelers, food, and water. Most do not so i feel like if we raised taxes on them it would help that the people who have the most are contributing.

 @BBV7TKM from Arizona  agreed…3mos3MO

Class should be divided because not everyone earns the same salary or gets paid the same so placing people on the same scale when they're not on the same scale will just make things more complicated than it has to be.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this agreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias3%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown