No

According to the US Government's Census information, less than 2% of daily trips are made using public transportation, as opposed to 87% of trips made in personal vehicles. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-48.pdf

According to the US Government's Census information, less than 2% of daily trips are made using public transportation, as opposed to 87% of trips made in personal vehicles. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-48.pdf

Making sure that the highway and roads are handled and expanded is important so that more people can get from place to place. 1 argument could be that there is always traffic on smaller highways, but never in public transport like trams or trains.

Highways are what keep America running, truckers use them everyday to transport materials, food, etc. They are essential to the growth of our economy.

While the environmental arguments against highway expansions are valid, the economic and societal benefits of these projects, particularly in terms of job creation, commerce, and essential connectivity, are undeniable.

There's not a critical reason I can think of that is a pro of doing this, if you drive, you'd know without highways medium-long distance travel would be a pain. If you don't drive and just want to vote, or think it would be better without anything statistically stating that a ban on highway expansions is a good thing, you shouldn't be allowed to vote. That being said show me 3 reasons with statistics on why it would be a good thing, then maybe it'll resonate.

Think of roads in your area that have gotten bigger and had changes in the past 10 years, it has helped a lot.

I think highway expansion should be banned because more highways do more good then harm i say that because its killing are environment

Even if "induced demand" fills the new lanes, the road is now moving a significantly higher volume of people and freight. This boosts economic productivity by supporting supply chains and "just-in-time" deliveries that public transit cannot handle. Additionally, in many suburban regions, the density required for efficient rail doesn't exist, making highway modernization the only practical way to support a growing population.

Banning highway expansions would be a problem within the country, not letting out country breathe with the growth of the population over years.

If you stop expanding highways, you can end up with worse congestion, longer commutes, and more time stuck in traffic. Second, population keeps growing. More people means more drivers. Without expanding infrastructure, the system gets overloaded, which can hurt the economy by slowing down shipping, commuting, and emergency services.

If access to highways is restricted, numerous other roads will experience severe traffic congestion; this will result in increased travel times for vehicles and, more critically, lead to excessive fuel consumption and environmental pollution.

By building more highways, we can reduce the amount of traffic caused by limited routes and significantly improve the daily lives of people. This also allows various goods to be transported much more quickly, such as fresh produce. This will allow them to be shipped and arrive much quicker to stores and prevent them from spoiling, as well as saving time to avoid transportation costs rising.

Arguments against banning highway expansions center on the economic, logistical, and developmental necessity of maintaining and expanding transportation infrastructure.

Highway expansions increase how many people and goods can travel. As populations grow, not expanding roads can make congestion worse, while expansion helps support jobs, travel, and the economy.

Most people in Philadelphia drives to New Jeresey everyday to get to work so we would need high ways.

when a car constantly starts and stops on the road it consumes more gas than if they were cruising at a consistant speed

Highways have no harm on society. But even though it harms economies, it’s more worth getting more people around states.

have you ever ran late and were anxious because of slow drivers or traffic. If highways were expanded you wouldnt have to worry about being late

According to artba.org for every 1 billion dollars in highway and bridge infrastructure investments, 13,000 jobs are supported.

Well, without more roads, how are people expected to get from one place to another fast enough, like say someone's kid was dying, and they would be trying to get there as fast as they could. Still, they band highways so there were stuck on the highway, so they were waiting in a big line of cars. Without highways, you can move freely on a road to get to the place you need on time.

More people are using roads every year as the population grows. Studies show that when highways are not expanded, traffic congestion increases and travel time becomes longer. For example, in many big cities, drivers spend dozens of extra hours each year stuck in traffic. Expanding highways can reduce congestion, improve travel speed, and support economic growth by making transportation faster and more efficient.

Highways are made so we don't touch land that's hard to work with and if we use that land instead of making highways we'd be destroying the ecosystem around there.

National Highway systems cost a lot for little work. More government control doesn’t mean better roads.

The reason is because by building more highways or expanding them it'll take up more space and land.

After a 9-5, what's the first thing you're thinking of? Going home right, imagine if we expanded highways how much time and traffic and honestly just ruckus for all of our hardworking citizens to sit through when all they rather do is go home.

Highway Expansions should not be banned because roads are essential to economic growth, freight transportation, and public safety.

It's part of our infrastructure and many people depend on it, so banning expansions would be counterintuitive.

Expanding highways is a usage of tax money that could be used for other issues, also the government can have individuals be more conferrable with using public transportation.

Highway expansion has a high rate of return, large scale road projects mean there will be more people who need to be employed so more job opportunity, and adding more lanes can generate more money.

People all over the world are getting into accidents, traffic jams, and all because there late to work or driving irresponsibly in the heat of the moment. With more highways this can be prevented and lives can be saved all over the world.

the highway is very important people use it in their everyday lives that's how our food gets transported and everything else

It could help get people to the airport or just in general when they're going somewhere or just on a road trip

feel like expand highways is just a good way for our truckers for example to maximize their money and reduce time on the road

just here in Temecula, there is traffic every day, and in the highways, in the morning, and around at 5 or 6 pm when everyone is heading home, there is a lot of traffic, a 1 hour trip can take you like 1:30 or 1:45 minutes

With our growing population of both people and drivers, more lanes to avoid conjestion is imparitive. Public transportation only helps so much and is too streamline for some peoples lives and needs.

Everyone has been in traffic, and late, then you get mad and wonder how to fix it, more lanes, more room

Very few trips are made using public transport due to the fact that public transport is heavily underfunded & under-utilized.

Some animals are on the risk of extinction because their habitats are getting destroyed due to the fact that construction happens.

if there were better public transportation systems in place then everyone would be able to reach where they need at a greatly reduced co2 output.

About 70% of U.S. freight moves by trucks on highways, so banning highway expansion can slow deliveries, raise prices, and hurt the economy.

The global warming being caused by everyday concrete being laid down is insane. Each sidewalk, driveway, parking lot being made is warming the earth drastically.

Would you want to be stuck in traffic for hours? Imagine, you have to go to work but the highways are filled with cars, you decide to take the small streets but everyone else also thought of that so the small streets are packed as well. Building more highways will prevent the over population on highways and small streets as well.

focus on the need for regional connectivity, economic development, and flexibility to meet population growth.

If we stop being able to go to places we need to go, there will be no way to go anywhere without being severely late.

well ive seen that here in wichita the highways are always busy and its hard to move lanes if cars are just bunched up.

Accidents that occur most often when there is a shift in speed, this could be when someone rapidly speeds up, or has to suddenly stop (like for an animal crossing lanes or someone cutting you off). With the increase in the number of distracted drivers and the total number of drivers, there is a higher chance that someone slowing down in a traffic jam will be rear-ended by a distracted driver.

Stalling highway growth ignores the massive economic toll of traffic: congestion alone costs the trucking industry nearly $50 billion annually in lost productivity, which directly inflates the price of your groceries and goods. Since public transit cannot handle door-to-door freight or the needs of the 60% of rural areas without bus or rail, expansions are often the only way to maintain reliable access to jobs.

Most people travel by private vehicles and use the highway then citizens who use other transportation methods.

No highways are the most important thing we have without them it would be much harder to travel long distances.

While induced demand suggests traffic returns, supporters argue that expanding highways reduces bottlenecks and improves flow in the short to medium term.

Despite the fact that expansion is not the fix to solve the problem, congestion will worsen if it is banned, leading to commerce and mobility being harmed. We cannot remove the ability to expand highways since it will cause a huge economic drain and may cause citizens of that area mad. And that can cause negative impacts on jobs and etc..

In some cases of this happening where there is a barrier on the road that citizens can't do anything about, there is no efficient way of getting around that barrier other than having to turn around, and that might mean someone has to make a dangerous move of going on the other side of the road to get out of that situation.

When we expand our highways, it provides more people to move at a faster pace. Having the traffic smaller means it is less likely to be backed up.

Others like me don't like trains and subways. They are germy and normally unclean. As for buses, the air cooling systems always suck.

Traffic costs Americans billions every year and drivers can lose over 40 hours just sitting in traffic. Expanding highways can help reduce congestion. save time, and make roads safer, which is why banning them would not make sense.

there are new drivers every day and more cars being sold every day if you ban it then there will always be traffic and more accidents

If we ban highway expansions with the growing of local cities we will have more traffic and less paved roads that will quickly be turned to ruin.

We have a good amount of money put into the highway expansions right now, We could use more money to help those in low income areas.

Why would you wanna wake up 2 hours early just to get to your job or flight or wherever you're going, when your drive is probably a 35-50 minute drive. It might seem like an exaggeration, but talk to the citizens and see what they have to say. Expanding Highways could make almost everyone's time more efficient even if it's just for traveling too, sometimes it shouldn't take as long as it does to get to your vacation destination. It could also reduce the possibility of crashes and deaths during those crashes.

Banning highway expansions might sound like it would fix traffic, but data actually shows it usually doesn’t. There’s something called induced demand, which means when you add more lanes, more people end up driving. For example, a study by the University of California, Davis found that increasing highway capacity by 10% can lead to almost the same increase in traffic within a few years. So traffic just goes back to being bad again.

Also, highway expansions are really expensive. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials reports that building just one mil…  Read moree of urban highway can cost millions of dollars. That money could go to things like public transportation, which helps more people and reduces traffic long-term.

Arguments against a ban on highway expansion often center on the tangible, data-driven needs of a growing economy. To build a compelling "No" case, one must look at the specific roles highways play in the national supply chain, safety metrics, and economic output.

Because banning highway expansions may have a negative impact on our society, there would probably be more traffic and accidents to occur had our highways not been expanded.

Highway expansions can reduce congestion, improve travel times, and support economic growth by making it easier for people and goods to move around. They also help keep up with population growth and rising traffic demand.

Most of the population utilizes highways and private vehicle use, so it does not make sense to ban highway expansion.

If you can't handle sitting in traffic for a little longer than normal than your patience needs fixing, not the roads

According to the Alliance of Civic Engagement (ACE), it argues that increasing roadway capacity is necessary to address traffic congestion and provides critical economic benefits by facilitating the movement of goods and services.

https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-housing-policy/pros-and-cons-of-highway-expansion/

this is an article called "Reconstructing and analyzing the traffic flow during evacuation in Hurricane Irma" that speaks to argumentative point regarding the congestion on the highway due to there being many vehicles on the road in the midst of an evacuation.

because it is going to hurt people the only way you should be able to do that is if you tell the person and you give the person money and you talk to him in person and if he doesn't agree then you cant do it

Traveling through rural cities and towns can become a hassle, and if new highways are added it would reduce some times for travel, so if we ban the expansion then our travels would become more difficult.

If you used your eyes MOST people have cars and jobs and stuff like that use trucks to deliver supplies and stuff across the country so if there is no highways then there will be less trade across the country.

To support the "No" position on banning highway expansions, the argument shifts from mere convenience to measurable economic returns, safety advancements, and the critical needs of the national supply chain.

Highways will stay the same and won't improve, which could lead to holes and accidents along the way

Many areas don't have reliable public transportation. suburban and rural workers often depend on cars. A ban without strong alternatives, disproportionately affect lower income workers

Rural areas are not as affected by public transportation legislation, and the vast majority of the US is rural land. Highways are the best way to travel vast distances especially through rural areas, therefore banning expansion is stunting rural expansion as well.

Expanding highways allows for easier travel to all who owns a car, and with this being america nearly everyone owns a car.

According to the US Government's Census information, less than 2% of daily trips are made using public transportation, as opposed to 87% of trips made in personal vehicles. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-48.pdf

I, myself, must take the highways to get from work and back home, and I also live in another part of Fort Worth about 25% of the time. I know that MOST of the people in my life take the highway at least 5/7 days of the week as well. My life would be more expensive, stressful, and I would not be able to attend as many personal and important events as I need to.

There is an article called "Reconstructing and analyzing the traffic flow during evacuation in Hurricane Irma" that speaks to my point regarding the congestion on the highway due to there being many vehicles on the road in the midst of an evacuation.

Because of the world population constantly growing and immigrants moving into the United States that means more housing is needed which already causes congestion and a lot of traffic. Thus we need more highways.

I don't know I AM A KID nun of this maters anyways the government is just going to do whatever they want to no matter how it affects anyone as long as it benefits them

We will have more people using our roads and make it easier to trade with other states and transport goods

Creating a bigger more efficient highway would help the flow of traffic, reduce carbon emissions from stop and go traffic as well as making the commute shorter for people that have been pushed to more rural areas due to inflation in the housing market.

Most people travel by private vehicles and use the highway then citizens who use other transportation methods.

I think that traffic in Utah really sucks a lot of the time, and we have a lot of crashes on I15, so it may benefit us to have bigger highways and more room on the road.