Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Labor Unions

5.2k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Help

 @983K76N from Pennsylvania  agreed…3yrs3Y

I strongly agree that labor unions help the economy as it ensures that worker's will have their rights protected which will lead to their productivity increasing due to high morale. I personally support them since my eldest brother himself is part of a labor union, and it's lead by my uncle and was founded by my grandfather (who unsuccessfully ran for house one time).

 @B6JL9CN  from Virginia  disagreed…4wks4W

Labor Unions serve primarily to protect the least valuable worker in an organization these days. They serve their purpose in select scenarios but overall hold too much power and right to work laws ensure that businesses are able to actually function properly.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Hurt

 @9FMZ76Xdisagreed…2yrs2Y

Corporations don't have the best interest in their employees, so the employees should organize to support each other.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…4mos4MO

And demand higher wages? This in turns leads to the company being forced to raise their prices. Or better work hours. This leads to not enough work getting done which means they will produce less, so they need to sell what they do have for more.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Help, but ban their ability to make political donations

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Help, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Hurt, I support some private unions but am strongly against public unions

 @9FWF5QQIndependent from Georgia  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Unions shouldn't exist because corporations should take care of their employees. Seeing as that isn't the case, unions should be everywhere.

 @95DFSVNfrom North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9MFBRSL from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Help, but limit the powers of certain unions with a history of corruption or lack of accountability like police unions

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Help, but limit the powers of unions with a history of corruption or obstructing accountability such as police unions

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

In your opinion, is it better to negotiate as an individual or as part of a larger group, like a union, when seeking better pay or fair treatment at work?

 @9WXM5VK from Pennsylvania  answered…11mos11MO

I would say a larger group because I'm with people who are on the same page as me and would agree with what I'm talking about.

 @9YFGYZGRepublicanfrom Maine  answered…10mos10MO

 @9TS4G9Kfrom Virgin Islands  answered…12mos12MO

Larger group and trying to organise as a big worker's movement spread all over the country.

 @9TS4BH5answered…12mos12MO

When starting an union, is important to negotiate as a part of a larger group, because you are not only negotiating for myself but for the people

 @9FWBB4Y from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Hurt. Unions served their purpose, but not they have become just as corrupt as the corporations they were fighting.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

What exactly do you think their purpose is, and how have they already done it..?

  @anim_xst from Texas  disagreed…6mos6MO

#3 Engaged Labor Unions

Most significant labor unions were established when laborers were worked to near-death for a ridiculous amount of time. With the eight-hour workdays, forty-hour workweeks, and many labor laws we have in place right now, I believe unions have served their purpose.

 @9L74FFC from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Help, but limit the powers of unions with a history of avoiding accountability for misconduct like police unions

 @99QXK2HIndependentfrom Virgin Islands  answered…3yrs3Y

By and large, the time has passed when unions were critical, but they should not be banned. However, hey should also not be able to force employees to join

 @9GB8PDQ from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

Hurt, They allow for labor workers to decrease their dedication and commitment and expect equal pay for those who put in the "extra mile"

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Workers who "put in the extra mile" are doing so against their own class interests.

 @9D6RZXM from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Help in the sense that they ensure fair pay and work conditions, but too often are led by bad actors who protect incompetent employees

 @8WX2B45 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Both. As a bulwark against abuse of workers, unions provide an invaluable service to their members. However, too many unions have abandoned this basic responsibility in favor of exerting political power to protect outmoded practices and impede innovation.

 @B2JRMDK from Alabama  answered…8mos8MO

Help, unions have helped improve labor conditions over the decades. But, leadership can get faulty, so its good to stay aware and reform to the needs of the people under the unions.

 @9D3RPBQfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

Maybe unions always help the economy because the economy should be about the people and grassroots movements focusing on the people and workers are necessary

 @9FQMHF8 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Help,However these Labor unions must be Controlled and Organized by the state.With Independent labor unions banned

  @patrickwynneLibertarian from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

There are instances where they help, and others where they have hurt. Strong labor unions are necessary to ensure powerful organization do not suppress worker's rights.

 @9VJN68HIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…11mos11MO

I am torn on this. I think setting up a union is an important right for Americans and theoretically helps with the balance of power between owners, management and workers, but the standards need to be very high. It should not be used to get paid more working less, or to over-protect underperforming workers

 @9S2PDWW from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

After the client of labor unions in the latter half of the 20th century, many jobs were lost, and salaries went down. Labor unions have the ability to help the economy by promoting better wages, benefits, and working conditions for the workers. But the issue with labor unions is they can become corrupt and can drive corporations and companies into the mud never rise again. Labor unions can definitely help, but they can also hurt. It is important we find a balance between how much can a union realistically demand and how much is a company allowed to say no to before they have to give in. Is also important to remember that labor unions do not always represent their workers, Sometimes have favorite groups or sometimes they fight for benefits for those under them and it is not always what The workers demanded.

  @mechanicalloser from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Help, but with a focus on ensuring they operate with integrity and true representation of their members' needs.

 @9G3DHMG from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Hurt, the Government should abolish all forms of unions and have all union members receive the death penalty.

 @9DSL36Q from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Help,However I’m in favor of Labour Unions being Controlled And organized by the State.And no independent Labour Unions Allowed

 @8GRKBP4 from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Labor unions are supposed to protect workers. If the economy is affected negatively it means the corporations were abusing their workers and now the bad economy is a byproduct of corruption coming to light.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Have you ever considered the ethical responsibility businesses have towards their workers when it comes to wages and working conditions?

 @9TM3SM9 from Pennsylvania  answered…12mos12MO

I feel like companies treat workers like trash so i feel companies should have to pay more and have working conditions be safer

 @9TM2VVG from Illinois  answered…12mos12MO

I feel that they pay well but it is very hard work and is definitely a commitment

 @98FBB62 from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WTHFYP from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

Labor unions should be formed in response to a major issue that requires group action, solve said issue, then dissolve instead of becoming lobbying groups.

 @8FTYZB4 from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

 @972XDKH from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T7R5TL from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Labor unions definitely hurt the economy, but I still support them because workers/employees need power too

 @8JD9LG8 from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

This is a ridiculous question. The purpose of unions is not to impact the economy but to help workers.

 @8GJQNVHSocialist from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

Even if they hurt the economy in the sense of making corporations pay more, worker’s right matter more

 @8WBW7TZ from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Depends on how much the union leadership exploits their position for their own personal gain

 @92BWNVN from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

I think labor unions help the economy. My Grandpa was actually in a labor union.

 @8X6VWHQ from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Labor unions are meant to protect employees from employer abuses. This is a necessary harm to the economy that maintains a quality of life

 @8KSQZLD from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

Unions created safe working environments and livable wages. However, they have become too political. Pros and cons of unions.

 @8J7FFB4Progressive from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

They are a check on corporate power, and are more necessary the less that government does.

 @8HT2D2FSocialist from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Help, except in the case of some unions where the people working need to be held publicly accountable, like the police union and occasionally teacher's union

 @99YW9XG from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Hurt, but are neccesary to stop corporate abuse and greed

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  commented…2yrs2Y

How do they hurt..?

 @9CLWDVD from Michigan  commented…2yrs2Y

We need to stop conflating what's good for the economy with what's good for the American people.

 @BassBennySocialist from Montana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

A healthy economy can lead to more job opportunities, higher wages, and increased government revenue for public services. Meanwhile, a robust and healthy population can contribute to economic growth by providing a strong labor force. Therefore, it's not about separating the two, but finding a balance where both can thrive.

 @8FVJQ6ZSocialistfrom Maine  answered…5yrs5Y

 @B6VZLP8 from North Carolina  answered…7 days7D

They help in certain areas, but not in all instances. Many areas of the country have developed without unions, so there are other protections in place.

 @B6TFX2WIndependent from Kentucky  answered…1wk1W

Helpful on the whole, but that has to be understood in the context that unions are part and parcel of a system with a variety of competing interests. That said, public unions ought to be heavily weakened, if not dismantled outright.

 @B6SDP82 from Texas  answered…1wk1W

They help, only In times it's completely necessary, otherwise they shouldn't be formed if it's on reasons that do not benefit the people. Unnecessary rebellions against the federal government whenever they are trying to aid the country, should not be formed.

 @B6SCRYN from Illinois  answered…2wks2W

Some Unions likely are corrupt or incompetent, but also companies find ways to use unions or prevent their existence, so a more complex solution is likely needed

 @B6R6GMV from Louisiana  answered…2wks2W

Help, and should be strengthened, but also reformed so that they do not protect bad actors and cannot make political donations or form Super PACs

 @B3VGV2T  from California  answered…3wks3W

Labor unions have a generally positive effect on the economy, as they boost wages, reduce inequality, and improve productivity by giving workers more say in the workplace, leading to a stronger middle class and more resilient economy. Studies, including a report from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, suggest that unions contribute to economic growth and resilience by lowering income inequality, improving working conditions, and increasing employee engagement and productivity. While some argue unions can increase costs and prices, the prevailing evidence indicates that the benefits of incre…  Read more

 @B6LLR4W from Oklahoma  answered…3wks3W

Both I think they help the economy for employees to see how they can make an influence on the economy but it hurts because they do not see how corruption takes hold and we need to implement reforms on labor unions

 @B6K5MMX from California  answered…4wks4W

Depending on the people's values and goals, as well as the way they go about it. It should be peaceful and controlled. Mostly, it helps the economy learn and grow.

 @B6JX4DS from California  answered…4wks4W

I think its important to have labor unions however some definitely do hurt the economy or don't do anything for it, in rare cases help due to people wanting to work there

 @B6JW8FG from New York  answered…4wks4W

Get the corruption out and continue to help it's members but members don't get priority over non members

 @B6HBNP8 from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

Labor unions should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine their effect(s) on the economy. I feel the same way, not every labor union helps and not every labor union hurts

 @B6GVNYH from Virginia  answered…1mo1MO

Labor unions help the economy because bald heads like Jeff Bezos would actually sell your families organs to buy a new yacht.

 @B6FWZDS from California  answered…1mo1MO

Depends mostly no because big businesses keep to much money and should give higher wages to workers and should put more money in are economy to get hard working Americans out of poverty and I believe they would still be rich after all that

 @B6DLC2C from Indiana  answered…1mo1MO

Labor Unions fundamentally "hurt" the economy but they are inherently a good thing; if the workers cannot organize then the workers cannot bargain for their rights, and no bargaining means easy leeway for little pay, and little pay means no consumption. (unions should actually form the basis of economic management/production, but we're thinking pragmatically here for the sake of test. I'm no reformist.)

 @B6BYVJZ from Oregon  answered…2mos2MO

Help, but the government should mediate between employees and employers, and don’t allow donations from corps or unions

 @B65CHCF from Utah  answered…2mos2MO

Help, but they need to be reformed. There are some powers they should not have and other powers that they should.

 @B637GDQIndependent from California  answered…2mos2MO

Depends. Some have helped working class, others are corrupt and do nothing for the average working citizen.

 @B5Y566FPeace and Freedom from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

the economic impact of labor unions is complex, with arguments for both positive and negative effects.

 @B5XP2CFSocialist from Indiana  answered…3mos3MO

Unions help the economy. Unions are not inherently corrupt. Any union that is corrupt should be investigated as if it were any other organization.

 @B5W9TSDfrom Montana  answered…3mos3MO

While they may sometimes be beneficial, they should be permitted because people have a right to stand up for themselves.

 @Aantwan90  from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

Help. Until the workers can seize control of the means of production, they are indispensable and essential to retaking the power and economic leverage from capitalists

 @B5T6WQ6  from Kentucky  answered…3mos3MO

Depends on the union. Historically, they've helped. Currently, it seems they've become more controversial.

 @B5SSL9Pfrom Maine  answered…3mos3MO

Help, in theory, I support some private unions but am strongly against public unions and Unions in general have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

 @B5SMS87Libertarian from Florida  answered…3mos3MO

Sometimes they help, other times they hurt. Regardless there should be no unions for government employees.

 @B5SCHX6 from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

Help, but many labor unions should be investigated in case of allegations of corruption, but instead of abolishing them, reform them, and keep their powers, political or whatnot, relatively the same

 @B5LD8GR  from Virginia  answered…4mos4MO

Regardless of how they impact the economy, the rights of the people will always be infinitely more important than the benefits of their work to the economy.

 @B5FV5CY from Florida  answered…4mos4MO

Labor unions help the economy by promoting fair wages, better working conditions, greater economic equality, and political engagement, while some criticisms around costs and flexibility require balanced policy approaches.

 @B5FBC8Gfrom Virgin Islands  answered…4mos4MO

Help, they should be more universal and right of first refusal for any sale of the enterprise they are operating in.

 @B5BMC8C from Connecticut  answered…4mos4MO

Some help but most, like the National AFT, AFSCME & AFL-CIO are corrupt and waste their membership's money on political influence peddling.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican  from Maryland  answered…4mos4MO

Hurt, by demanding higher wages and better hours, the company they work for will be forced to sell their goods for higher in order to make the same profits

 @B58P2QNSocialist from New York  answered…4mos4MO

I don’t care whether they’re good or bad for the economy that’s overwhelmingly owned by a tiny elite fraction of the population. Unions exist to advocate for the interests of workers, which is why I almost always support them.

 @B58NX8HIndependent from Kansas  answered…4mos4MO

Hello there labor unions do not hurt the economy they just help register workers into a labor force and giving them employee rights

 @B58JJKS from Kansas  answered…4mos4MO

Neither we should have labor unions but make sure they are accountable for their actions and to make sure that psychological they work for there union members and workers

 @B583CPD from Rhode Island  answered…4mos4MO

They can either be helpful or hurtful depending on how they function. As long as they aren't publicly funded...

 @B56VSQQ from Nebraska  answered…4mos4MO

I believe local unions are essential to protect the rights of the worker. Nation-wide unions however are only corrupt and unaccountable political organizations that should be abolished.

 @B56H9WQ from Illinois  answered…4mos4MO

I support unions when they work for their people. I do not support unions backing political candidates

 @B52DWYM from Virginia  answered…5mos5MO

Unions can be a great help to people with limited education or opportunity, but their financial corruption is too well-proven not to want careful scrutiny applied to them on an ongoing basis.

 @B4Z4QPMfrom PR  answered…5mos5MO

Labor unions don't hurt or help, they look out for the interests of the workers while the company looks out for the interests of the company. The tug of war game they play is good.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...