Should the federal government increase funding of health care for low income individuals (Medicaid)?
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Filter by type
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Filter by author
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
County:
233 Replies
@9FN2SGW 3yrs3Y
There are much more people with unavoidable illnesses that aren’t considered elderly or disabled. Also, if something a diagnosis isn’t considered “serious enough” it could cost people their lives which is why health care should be offered to everyone and not just those who can afford it and not just those who qualify for free Medicaid from the government. The lower middle class suffer the most.
@98NVJ3P 3yrs3Y
To people who are unable to afford healthcare because their income does not allow it nor for them to receive private insurance, Medicaid is essential.
@9FF2LN7Women’s Equality3yrs3Y
@9FRJT8J 3yrs3Y
Medicaid was initially implemented as a means for all citizens to have access to healthcare. Not only does this cover the elderly and disabled, but the poor as well. Low class citizens should also have access to Medicaid.
The purpose of the state is to protect the rights of citizens, allowing insurance companies to decide what they will pay for, what they won’t without thought about what would be best for the person is against this, and one way to try and fix it would be for the government to pay for anything a insurance company would consider, creating a single payer system.
@9F4M3X53yrs3Y
Top Disagreement
How would those who are incapable of producing the money to pay for medical services live? What about those who've lost employment to no fault of their own? This stance only makes sense on the surface.
@BuckLarryProgressive3yrs3Y
While I understand your concerns, it is also important to consider the fiscal health of our country. Continuously increasing funding for social programs without a balanced budget could lead to the devaluation of our currency and inflation. For instance, in the 1980s, many Latin American countries experienced hyperinflation due to excessive government spending. This resulted in severe economic instability and poverty. Instead, perhaps we should focus on creating more robust job programs and affordable housing to help lower-income individuals get back on their feet. What are your thoughts on this approach?
@VulcanMan6 3yrs3Y
@9F83SCT 3yrs3Y
I am a disabled person and denied assurance so I feel the program should be reworked because people need help and they aren't receiving their basically human rights
@9FDZFRJ3yrs3Y
I do feel that many government programs like this really need to be reworked. They barely work and don't really help those it is supposed to help.
I completely agree with you. It's like trying to fix a leaky faucet with duct tape. It might work for a while, but eventually, it's going to fail. Similarly, our current healthcare system has its cracks, and the solution seems to be more duct tape instead of addressing the root cause. For instance, high administrative costs are a significant issue in our health care system. Instead of adding more funds to cover these costs, wouldn't it be more beneficial to streamline and simplify the process? What are your thoughts on how we could do this effectively?
@9FFDDN93yrs3Y
@9FFBFLY3yrs3Y
@9FF6HMT3yrs3Y
@9F6RZ393yrs3Y
@9FP4P8T3yrs3Y
@9GQV4B7 3yrs3Y
Health care should increase funding for those who make a certain amount of money and include exceptions like the elderly and disabled.
@9GQX4V53yrs3Y
@9GQW8LY3yrs3Y
@9FNTG8Z3yrs3Y
@9F88NNM3yrs3Y
@9FG32BN3yrs3Y
@9F8B77M3yrs3Y
@9FRLY3H3yrs3Y
@9F8B3WR3yrs3Y
@9F8D9L5Progressive3yrs3Y
@9F7Z2KX3yrs3Y
@9F8B59Y3yrs3Y
While it will be hugely expensive to society to keep medical care affordable to individuals, it will absolutely save lives. Because of that, it's worth every cent. And while it's important to focus limited resources to those who need it the most, I think we can agree that the trillions spent on defense spending are doing a whole lot less good than affordable medical care.
@9F85YPF3yrs3Y
@9F86VRS3yrs3Y
@9F8B3KR3yrs3Y
@9F7TD8X3yrs3Y
@9F87T7V3yrs3Y
@9F7YCWQ3yrs3Y
@9F7YKXH3yrs3Y
Well, there are families with low income and parent's that barely make it paycheck to paycheck. It would be helpful to the families to not stress if they will have enough money that month to pay for their kids meals, clothes, and school items. Giving low income families the money will help them lead their families in the right direction.
@9F6R6TK3yrs3Y
@9F88T7YLibertarian3yrs3Y
@9F89K3P3yrs3Y
@9F7Z8M93yrs3Y
@9FPC4BF3yrs3Y
@9F7QJDD3yrs3Y
@9F88BGN3yrs3Y
@9FLVZ7Z3yrs3Y
@9F8DPKC3yrs3Y
@9F7YQ8G3yrs3Y
@9F7PZ3T3yrs3Y
@9F6BVF73yrs3Y
@9F7RMDY3yrs3Y
@9F7RHV83yrs3Y
@9F7WGBT3yrs3Y
@9F7Y8WX3yrs3Y
@9F8DN283yrs3Y
@9FG63TPWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
As of Medicaid, I think everyone should have eligibility to it. There are many babies, kids, teens, and adults that struggle with health issues that many families worry not being able to pay for. I believe that health is an issue that no one should have to pay nor worry about. Many of these health issues are problems that many wish they didnt have, so just being able to have the benefits Medicaid provides, can have a huge relieve impact on anyone who struggles with health issues.
@9F85KGZ3yrs3Y
Just because somebody is not elderly or disabled does not mean they do not need Medicaid. Many families are living paycheck to paycheck and have no room for savings or medical bills. If a health emergency comes up for one of these families and they don't have Medicaid they will likely have to live with the health risk even if it kills them.
@9F86BZW3yrs3Y
@9FNRH6W3yrs3Y
@9F7ZW3G3yrs3Y
@9F7JQJ63yrs3Y
@9F7YWH23yrs3Y
@9F83R5V3yrs3Y
@9F7T9863yrs3Y
@9F7WV7Y3yrs3Y
eligibility should not just include the elderly and disabled because they are not the only ones that need help moving forwards with life.someone might have a low income job they are jsut getting by at, and having to pay essentially any medical bill will set said person back anywhere from a month to a year depending on the injury. medicaid should be allowed for all people below a certain income standard
@9F7R9XL3yrs3Y
@9F7QYX63yrs3Y
@9F7NL7G3yrs3Y
@9F7HXQC3yrs3Y
@9F732ZW3yrs3Y
Everyone deserves free healthcare. healthcare come under the rights of LIFE liberty and the pursuit of happiness
@IdealisticFlamingo3yrs3Y
While it's a noble sentiment to see healthcare as a right under the purview of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, it's important to remember that these rights as defined by our Constitution don't guarantee government-funded provisions. For example, we have the right to pursue happiness, but that doesn't mean the government is obligated to provide us with things that make us happy like free movies or travel.
Similarly, one could argue that the right to life doesn't necessarily guarantee free healthcare. It ensures protection from harm, but doesn't oblige the government to provide all means of maintaining health.
However, this doesn't negate the necessity for a comprehensive healthcare system. How do you think we can balance the need for healthcare with the limitations of government resources?
@9F6VV6S3yrs3Y
@9F7MGWD3yrs3Y
@9F6S69D3yrs3Y
Despite funding restrictions the U.S. should provide adequate healthcare to all citizens as it is a human right and to let people, notably those who cannot afford medical support, sustain potential irreparable or fatal damage . In much if the rest of the world healthcare is a given, however many if these countries employ higher taxes on all income brackets to afford more social supports for all citizens.
@9F89DH23yrs3Y
@9F7Y8ZM3yrs3Y
@9F7SB3K3yrs3Y
While it's true that not only the elderly need Medicaid, but also those in low-wage jobs or with limited means, it's also important to consider the broad implications of expanding Medicaid eligibility. For instance, expanding Medicaid too much could potentially strain the system, potentially reducing the quality of care for those who need it most, like the elderly and disabled. One could argue that a more targeted approach, focusing on job creation and wage growth, might be more effective in the long run. What do you think about the idea of focusing on economic growth as a means to reduce the need for Medicaid?
@9F7WKTHIndependent3yrs3Y
@9FG7LB43yrs3Y
@9F7FRXB3yrs3Y
@9F6C2DR3yrs3Y
I Think that there should be a nation wide healthcare system in the u.s divvied from nation to state, state to counties, counties to smaller areas /small cites and towns. it should be for everyone because it a basic human right not just for the elderly. some areas need more aid then other and it can be managed for each area and careful spending and cutting out unnecessary fundings from different programs. the country and each state are Caple to provide each of there citizens free universal healthcare.
@9F7RTLG3yrs3Y
@9F6RL663yrs3Y
@9FGG2S3Independent3yrs3Y
@9F6QG9F3yrs3Y
@9F7TGHR3yrs3Y
@9F7FHG93yrs3Y
@9F8736Z3yrs3Y
@9F7DHP93yrs3Y
With how our current services are set up, not everyone who is disabled currently has access to medical assistance to get that disability confirmed or diagnosed in the first place, and I believe putting more requirements in place to try to ensure "only elderly and disabled people" get access to Medicaid would actually end in even less people who need that care being able to access it.
@9FMKMXQ3yrs3Y
@9F6TFXZ3yrs3Y
@9FLKXF33yrs3Y
@9FN2GGDWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
Demographics
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
More conversations
Join in on more popular conversations.
