Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Abortion

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Abortion

85783 Replies

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @9FWTQ62  from Michigan  answered…9mos9MO

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

Engaged Abortion

Let’s leave science and medicine to scientists and doctors. Not geriatric dementia patients riding on a government check with free, unlimited healthcare, and no financial or personal consequence for their decisions or actions.

 @unknown81311  from Idaho  answered…10mos10MO

Pro-Life, ban after the first three months, but allow for abortion prior to this period. Also providing birth control, sex education, and social services could help reduce the number of abortions.

 @5QXSKLVRepublican  from Kentucky  answered…10mos10MO

I am pro-choice because I believe that women have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. However, beyond supporting the right to choose, it is essential to focus on comprehensive measures that can reduce the number of abortions overall. By providing accessible birth control options, ensuring thorough and factual sex education, and expanding social services that support families and individuals, we can create an environment where unintended pregnancies are less likely to occur. These proactive steps empower people with knowledge, resources, and support, promoting informed choices and better overall health outcomes for society. Ensuring comprehensive support systems helps individuals make decisions that are right for them, while also fostering healthier and more informed communities.

 @4XD28G7Independent answered…11mos11MO

Pro choice, but ban abortions after fetal viability UNLESS the health of the mother or baby is in question. At the same time we need to have a nationwide standard for good sex ed, make contraceptives cheap and readily available, and remove unnecessary barriers to early abortion.

 @9PTVYZ4  from New York  answered…11mos11MO

Pro-choice

Pro-choice

If you can't force someone to donate organs to save someone's life, then you can't force someone to use their body to create another life.

  @BullMooseQuakerAmerican Solidarity  from Kentucky  answered…1yr1Y

Pro-Life, but I do support providing birth control, sex education, and more social services to help single mothers eliminate the need for abortions.

 @3JCDSRRLibertarian answered…1yr1Y

Moralistic I'm pro-life, I think life is too precious. Politically I don't think the government has the right to dictate what someone does medically with there body.

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian  from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

I am pro-choice but the government has no right to ban abortion. It should be left to insurance providers to cover it

 @7PTCG38Democrat  from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 22nd week of pregnancy unless there is danger to the mother or fetus' health

 @9HGZK7SCA Common Sense from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases where the mother is in danger, rape, incest, or the mother and father are unable to or unwilling to an exceeding degree to provide for the child.

 @9G43FYQSocialist from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

I pick neither. But there should definitely be more education involved in these situations or else things like will keep happening frequently. I also do immensely agree that the government has absolutely NO right whatsoever to ban abortion. That shouldn't be there choice. It should be the women who are going through it. As, how would a man know?

 @9DMFVDS from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-life, except in the case of rape, incest, or danger BUT the government should have no right to ban abortions or decide what people do with their own bodies, it should be up to the person who is carrying the child

 @7KPWC57 from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

Pro choice, but ban after the first eight weeks.

 @7PTCG38Democrat  from Wisconsin  answered…9mos9MO

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months or if there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @GuitarLord25Socialist from Vermont  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions. It is also essential the we codify Roe v Wade to protect bodily liberty and autonomy.

  @JonBSimConstitutionfrom Kentucky  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life

Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of Rape and Incest, but allow in cases of Danger to the Mother.

The sex revolution has ended with joyless happiness, short-lived pleasure, reductionism of marriage, and objectification of sexes, to name a few.

You don't answer the evil of rape with the murder of the child.

The only legitimate reason for abortion is the life of the mother.

Elective abortion is simply murder out of convenience and an escape from the consequences of actions.

 @JoseVenturaAmerican Solidarityfrom Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life, but both allowing in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child, as well as providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions

 @92PYY62 from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Life, but abortion should be legal until the baby has a beating heart, with exceptions for danger to the mother or child.

 @naomioniSocialist from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, through providing birth control, sex education, paid parental leave, and more social services which will help reduce the number of abortions. Social Services would include Medicare For All, Universal Pre-K, Free School Meals, etc. which would reduce economic hardship faced by those who choose to have a child. Also improving the Foster Care system for those who do not choose to keep their child.

 @naomioniSocialist from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, through providing birth control, sex education, paid parental leave, and more social services which will help reduce the number of abortions. Social Services would include Medicare For All, Universal Pre-K, School Meals, etc. which would reduce economic hardship faced by women who choose to have a child. Also improving the Foster Care system for women who do not choose to keep their child.

 @8Q7WTNZ from California  answered…5yrs5Y

I am Pro-abortion. The idea that being anti-abortion is called "pro-life" is stupid.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 21st week of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban as of the 22nd week of pregnancy (the general medically accepted time at which a fetus can first feel pain) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban as of the 22nd week of pregnancy (the approximate medically accepted time at which a fetus can first feel pain) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 20th week of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 20 weeks of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro Life, but allow abortions only in the first trimester, with exceptions in cases of danger to mother's or child's life.

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro Life, but allow abortions only in the first trimester, with exceptions in cases of danger to mother's or child's life. Provide subsidies for adoption

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro Life, but allow abortions only in the first trimester, with exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and danger to mother or child

 @naomioniSocialist from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Pro-life, through providing birth control, sex education, paid parental leave, and more social services which will help reduce the number of abortions. Social Services would include Medicare For All, Universal Pre-K, Free School Meals, etc. which would reduce the economic hardship faced by those who choose to have a child. Also improving the Foster Care system for those who do not choose to keep their child.

 @86N5Z35Independent from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions. Ban late-term abortion until more research is done on when a fetus can feel pain.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months unless there is danger to health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @4XD28G7Independentanswered…4yrs4Y

Pro choice, but ban late term abortions unless there is a risk to the mother's health or there are extreme health complications that could severely inhibit the infant's quality of life. Also, continue to ensure that there are protections for any infant born alive after an abortion.

 @8T4F745 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-Life, but providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of infanticides

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days of gestation unless there is danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days unless there is danger to the mother or child

  @BestPoliticsIN from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Pro-life, except in cases of rape, as in all other cases the mother chose not to use protection

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days unless there is danger to the health of the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first 120 days of pregnancy unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months (120 days) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban during the final trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the health of the mother

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first two months unless there is danger to the mother or child.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first two months unless there is danger to the physical health of the mother or child.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after 16 weeks of gestation unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first trimester of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 20th week of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months of pregnancy unless there are complications that present danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months of pregnancy except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the 20th week of gestation (when a fetus can feel pain) unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the second trimester unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the second trimester unless there is danger to the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first four months of pregnancy are completed unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban during the final trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or fetus

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban after the first trimester of pregnancy is completed unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Engaged Abortion

Pro-choice, but ban during the final trimester of pregnancy unless there is danger to the health of the mother or unborn child

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...