Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Options

 @9NS9S4Y from Georgia answered…19mins19m

The President should be able to authorize military force within the United States quickly however, I do believe that mil…

 @9NS8LFP from Texas answered…46mins46m

Jil Stein will not fix America

 @9NS8L6C from North Carolina answered…46mins46m

He isn't on the ballot.

 @9NS8L6C from North Carolina answered…46mins46m

Incentivize long-term and tax higher micro-term. Add a tiny tax to every transaction inverse to the time held, for up t…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. The market should decide. The government should only be policing collusion and other obviously discriminatory prac…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Yes, within US borders. Countries south of the US don't really want to stop the drugs - corruption and fraud is rampant…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

With the foreign government's consent - and if there is incontrovertible evidence they have already attacked the United…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Congress has not declared war since the days following Pearl Harbor. We have not been "at war" since World War II. Doe…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Abortion is bad. The nuclear family must be bolstered and parents needs to make choices about sex be a life long learni…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. While this SOUNDS safer - imagine if a hostile, foreign entity is eventually able to "hack" the block chain. It wo…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. They should all be turned away at the border. However, as the greatest nation which has ever existed - our tax dol…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. Should government wish to waste our tax dollars, run all the PSA they want - but let the American people and The Ma…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Only for diseases which there is no herd immunity and which are an imminent threat. The world is a dangerous place - we…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. But violation of law should permanently put any entity abusing the technology and/or using it unethically out of bu…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. The government should protect it's citizens and HARSHLY punish entities which intentionally use AI in harmful ways.

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Yes. There should be no collection of personal data by ANY entity. It's an industry however. The economy would lean t…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. But if large tech companies are intentionally targeting minors, knowingly jeopardizing their health, they should be…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

Yes, it should be allowed - but not encouraged as security technology is not where it needs to be. As long as the risk…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. Drugs are bad. Why are cities rushing to make their streets and intersections safer the last couple years? There…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. Most minorities are insulted by these programs and understand they're wrought with fraud and corruption and are hur…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

No. This should not even be up for debate. Neither side should be able to "pack" the court. There should not be "side…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…48mins48m

If they qualify to own and carry a gun in their current state, they should have to prove proficiency for concealed carry…

 @9NS7V6D from California answered…1hr1H

Eleni more qualified

 @9NS7V6D from California answered…1hr1H

choices, choices!

 @9NS7RZR from Pennsylvania answered…1hr1H

He is a far-left communist liberal