Try the political quiz

Individualist

You believe individual rights and freedoms are the foundation of a just society, and no collective should override personal autonomy.

Overview Issues Discuss

Individualist policies on electoral issues

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Elections  ›  Mental competency testing

Should politicians over 75 years of age have required to pass a mental competency test?

I>I  ChatGPTNo, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

Elections  ›  Foreign Lobbying

Should foreign lobbyists be allowed to raise money for American elections?

I>I  ChatGPTYes, as long as all donations are public knowledge to ensure there is no conflict of interest

Elections  ›  Voter Fraud

Should a photo ID be required to vote?

I>I  ChatGPTNo, and there is little evidence that voter fraud even exists

Elections  ›  Right of Foreigners to Vote

Should foreigners currently residing in the United States have the right to vote?

I>I  ChatGPTYes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote

Elections  ›  Criminal Politicians

Should a politician who has been formerly convicted of a crime be allowed to run for office?

I>I  ChatGPTYes

How similar are your political beliefs to Individualist issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Elections  ›  Campaign Finance

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

I>I  ChatGPTNo

Elections  ›  Minimum Voting Age

Should the minimum voting age be lowered?

I>I  ChatGPTYes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote

Elections  ›  Electoral College

Should the electoral college be abolished?

I>I  ChatGPTYes, and switch to a ranked voting system

Elections  ›  Campaign Finance

Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

I>I  ChatGPTYes

Elections  ›  Automatic Voter Registration

Should the government automatically register every eligible citizen to vote?

I>I  ChatGPTNo

Elections  ›  Mail in ballots

Should every voter automatically receive a mail in ballot?

I>I  ChatGPTYes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Elections  ›  Candidate Transparency

Should political candidates be required to release their recent tax returns to the public?

I>I  ChatGPTNo, their income is none of our business

Elections  ›  Lobbyists

Should there be a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government?

I>I  ChatGPTNo

Elections  ›  Ranked Choice Voting

Should the federal government mandate Ranked Choice Voting for all congressional elections?

I>I  ChatGPTNo

Elections  ›  Election Day Holiday

Should federal election day be a national holiday?

I>I  ChatGPTNo, a mid-week economic shutdown costs billions

Elections  ›  Legalize Election Betting

Should it be legal for people to bet money on the outcomes of political elections?

I>I  ChatGPTYes

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies