More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Master's Degree voters
Last answered 4 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Master's Degree voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 29, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Education data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
That's enough money to hit a lot of areas I think. My grandson is in a Magnet program and can't carry books home; books beat the nasty internet that most adults can't figure out anyway; what kind of crap is that? He's the... 6 years ago from a Republican in Houston, TX
Use $800 million a year in taxes paid by drilling companies from the Rainy Day Fund and put it towards transportation funding instead of taking it out of the Available School fund because they're the same amount. 6 years ago from a Green in Houston, TX
Why isn't the transportation systems being developed to have self-sustaining systems? Why did you allow a problem to exist that would result in even needing to ask this?. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Huntsville, TX
The $800 million could be used for other things, such as health care, social services for children, and education that will teach people how to be parents that provide for their children. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
I prefer not to express an opinion on issues I know nothing about and on those that are too complicated to reduce to a few words. 6 years ago from a Green in Houston, TX
No, save it and expand the state medicaid as outlined in the ACA. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Carrollton, TX
Only for necessary maintenance and safety... There's enough expansion of highways and public transportation already. No fast rail from Dallas to Ft. Worth. No Bullet Train from Dallas to Houston. 6 years ago from a Republican in Kennedale, TX
Yes, improved transportation is a huge benefit to the state. The oil and gas money flowing into Texas right now is enough to pay for many programs. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
No leave it in the rainy day fund. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Corpus Christi, TX
The rainy day fund is for a rainy day - not general consumption. We should be advocating spending on Public works, Public transportation, as well as staunchly and aggressively seeking a better education for our youth. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Houston, TX
Texas should invest in public education. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Austin, TX
Increase the budget for education. 7 years ago from a Democrat in San Antonio, TX
It should spend a substantial amount to develop long term project(s) to bring alternative sources of water [for instance desalinization; aqueducts] to central Texas and other historically dry areas. 7 years ago from a Republican in Austin, TX
No, current budget shortfalls are a direct result of corrupt and failed re-classifying transportation related income through taxes and over cost under performing contracts. 7 years ago from a Republican in Waring, TX
Yes, but only if it goes towards roads and bridges and not towards buses and trains. 7 years ago from a Republican in Dallas, TX
No, spend it on education. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Crowley, TX
Spend it on education. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Converse, TX
Only if it's for high speed rail and energy efficient transportation. 7 years ago from a Democrat in San Antonio, TX
Yes, but needs more work to keep the $$ out of the hands of political cronies.
The current administration is horribly corrupt. 7 years ago from a Green in Houston, TX
Government shouldn't have a "rainy day fund". 7 years ago from a Republican in Austin, TX
Yes, to repair roads and alleviate traffic in areas with many traffic accidents. 7 years ago from a Green in College Station, TX
Yes. However need to increase gasoline tax and fund transit capital projects as well. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Rockwall, TX
Depends on how much of the $800 million is of the whole rainy day fund. This should be done with a cost benefit analysis and a timeline to replace the $800 million with interest. 7 years ago from a Republican in Austin, TX
Yes, if it improves transportation in areas of high demand. 7 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
Only if it benefits the many and not the few. A 4 Billion Dollar rail in Austin has very few riders and cost way too much. 7 years ago from a Libertarian in Austin, TX
Depends on the way in which it is spent. No more Tolling of existing roadways. 7 years ago from a Republican in Austin, TX
Not all 800 M. 7 years ago from a Green in San Antonio, TX