Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-life, period. Adjusted for the rare exceptions such as incest, rape, and danger to the mother. Aborting babies is not the answer for our reprehensible societal acceptance of irresponsible sexual misconduct. In fact, it ads to the moral decay. Strong stance, period. |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerYes, give all parties (gay and straight) the right to choose the title of their union as "civil union" or "marriage" for the purpose of making them truly equal for secular benefits and do not force churches to perform any civil union or marriage that does not align with their religious doctrine. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes, add specific categories, i.e., anyone on a watch list, mentally unstable, convicted of domestic violence. |
Crime › Police Body Cameras
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only activated when interacting with the public. I believe there are more good police officers than bad ones. If they are required to wear these cameras, then the ratio of good vs. bad interactions should be well published. It's only fair. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerBased on religious beliefs, absolutely no. Based on our current security measures, absolutely yes. We are way under equipped to accurately screen for potential terror threats to our homeland via mass immigration and we must make our own security our foremost priority. We must continue to make this our priority until the very serious war time infiltration of extremists into the affected religion is squashed and no longer poses such costly and broad ranged threats. We must put more emphasis on the fact that legal immigrants do not have any other rights other than those established for all citizens, regardless of religion. We must create tougher penalties for all people, citizens and immigrants, who willingly defy their obligation to abide by our laws in order to abide by religious beliefs and/or laws of other countries that result in intentional bodily harm and death to others. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerNo, Planned Parenthood, from its inception has always had alternative immoral agendas disguised as humanity driven. These days, financial gain is too enticing. Most people only get to measure them by they want you to hear and see through media and brochures. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerNo, it is an inaccurate response to fair wage assessments and employee value. It only adds to the inflation problem and forces companies to look for alternative answers robotic replacement. This issue must be addressed from more complex angles. Fair wage issues have the same formula for deviant practice risks such as price fixing and must be addressed as an ethical responsibility of a domineering company operating in a free market. |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerYes, but not for climate change. I think that is unfounded for several contradicting reasons from both sides of the issue. However, the human toll through cancer causing agents is alarming and should have been addressed with more importance years ago. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerBlanketed criminalization of drug use is ineffective. Illegal drug sales should have tougher penalties while individual drug users who show a desire for getting clean should be offered longer term help programs as long as they continually show improvement. |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerNo. Student loans are excessive. But two wrongs do not make a right. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerMarijuana is the sleeper drug. Literally! It's a "do-nothing" drug. Users do-nothing. They, are for the most part, mush brains. Ironically, it's the mush brains that like to point out people who are successful while using marijuana. There are examples of successful people in all walks of life, despite their vices and hardships, so that's a dull argument. Marijuana is rightly used for medicinal purposes. Leisure use is a sleeping danger. |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerNot informed enough on this issue to make a sound choice. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerLawfully, no. Morally, governments should allow illegal and legal immigrants with medical needs who have committed no other crimes (besides illegally entering the US) the first option of returning to their country if it is compassionately equipped to handle their medical needs or, if impossible, the ability to access help from their country of citizenship with US medical costs that is based upon a fair pre-defined agreement between two compassionate countries. We have a moral obligation to God. This issue is better addressed with that in mind. |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerYes, this is a no brainer. We are spending too much. Increased taxes are not the answer for anyone. There is waste in everyone area of government and nothing in our system is above being overhauled and redefined. I believe this is a direct result of rider abuse and that issue must also be addressed. |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerYes, it is severely psychologically damaging to young undeveloped minds |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerNO!! BIG NO!!! We need to realize that there will ALWAYS be minority groups in every ethnicity. The key is to educate all groups about each other in a non-accusatory, non-historical environment with a fresh, clean slate for all of our children. |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerNo, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerNo, not publicly. The established laws of legally entering this country override the argument that illegals pay taxes. We all pay taxes but that does not give anyone the right to break our laws and then benefit from them. Come here with clean hands. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerNo! It's awful! This just made us slaves to insurance companies. As of this day and time, I hate insurance all together. Right now, no matter which way we turn, Insurance companies are going to get the best of us because they are crooked. Period! |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerYes, but it should be limited and balanced with research that can more accurately measure the long term effects of fracking. This is an area where I believe both sides have valid points. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
4>4 Personal answerYes, except for violent crimes, sex crimes and drug selling convictions. Only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.