Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
8>8 Personal answerNo, but make those who refuse to wear masks ineligible for COVID relief funds, then increase COVID relief payments. |
Social › Abortion
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
8>8 Personal answerYes, and adjust it to account for inflation and the local cost of living. But recognize this will increase the cost of local products and services, and may drive further outsourcing to the extent possible. |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Climate Change
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Taxes
8>8 Personal answerIt depends upon your definition of "rich". Raising taxes on those making millions per year probably won't work and there aren't enough of those people to make a difference anyway. Raising taxes on those making 250K+ would make a difference, but is that rich? Instead, we need to treat capital gains as income for tax purposes. |
Education › Student Loans
8>8 Personal answer1) Pool and redistribute local K-12 school funds at the federal level to provide funding for public schools nationwide, 2) Use some of the pooled funds to create multiple education tracks in high school like Germany has, so fewer people need a university education to make a living. Raise some taxes on wealthier people to pay for this if necessary, 3) Based on academic performance in high school, provide free university educations to excellent students. With fewer students attending universities, more funds shouldn't be necessary to accomplish this, but if they are then increase capital gains tax to provide funding. |
Social › Government Mandates
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
8>8 Personal answerYes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
8>8 Personal answerNo, but require vaccination in order to attend public school |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
8>8 Personal answerNo electricity generation should be subsidized. Power generators should be forced to bare the costs of ALL environmental damage from the full life cycle of electricity generation and disposal of wastes. Then the market will quickly re-equilibrate to find the actual lowest cost source of electricity. But research into better ways to generate electricity should be heavily subsidized. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
8>8 Personal answerSure, but first let's make sure US citizens have access to government-subsidized healthcare. Also, if we offer more services to illegal immigrants we will be forced to tighten immigration laws and reduce the number of illegal immigrants... |
the Environment › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Voter Fraud
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Border Wall
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
8>8 Personal answerLet's just automatically make anyone who lives in the US for 10+ years and abides by our laws a citizen. Then they can vote. |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
8>8 Personal answerA pilot project should be commissioned and its result studied before implementing a universal basic income program. |
the Environment › Dakota Access Pipeline
8>8 Personal answerNo, but the company and all investors must pay the FULL cost of all "externalities" like oil spills and climate change consequences. This means that the personal wealth of everyone involved, from executives to ordinary investors to workers who build the pipeline may lose all of their personal wealth in the event that the pipeline causes an environmental disaster. Without such strict liability, we (and our descendants) are all subsidising the cost of this pipeline. |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
8>8 Personal answerIf residents have to be in-state citizens to get tuition rates, then illegal immigrants should have to be legal citizens to receive the same benefits. |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
8>8 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
8>8 Personal answerI don't like it because burning any oil worsens climate change. But I accept domestic fracking is better than supporting oil dictatorships during the transition between an oil and electric transportation system. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
8>8 Personal answerYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
8>8 Personal answerDecrease |
Elections › Electoral College
8>8 Personal answerYes, and switch to a ranked voting system |
the Environment › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Science › Nuclear Energy
8>8 Personal answerYes |
Science › GMO Labels
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Education › Universal Pre-K
8>8 Personal answerUniversal preschool should either be provided at the cost of the government (federal or state), or the government should provide maternity leave, paternity leave, or a combination of both until the child is old enough to attend kindergarten. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
8>8 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
8>8 Personal answerJust add a pollution tax to all products to account for the socialized cost of pollution. Then the market will adjust to a saner, more sustainable future without outright bans. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
8>8 Personal answerYes |
National Security › Military Congressional Approval
8>8 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
8>8 Personal answerNo, but we need to amend the constitution to specify the rights of enemy combatants. These do not need to be the same as the rights of citizens, but if we add this to our constitution the question will be settled. |
the Environment › Paris Climate Agreement
8>8 Personal answerNo |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.