Try the political quiz
+

13 Replies

 @9FKZ8XM from Idaho  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If the government does not give health insurance a large portion of America will not be able to afford healthcare or medication for pre-existing medical conditions. A great example of this is Insulin witch costs less than 5 dollars to make but was charged over 1000 percent.

 @9FQLH8PRepublican  from California  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Government sponsored health insurance can help reduce cost by leveraging huge negotiation power with medical service providers and pharmaceutical companies.

 @9F4MZ98Progressive from Missouri  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Universal healthcare has proven to provide superior healthcare and reduce economic stress on all individuals, as well as increasing general productivity of the populous.

 @MinorityBradyLibertarian from Arizona  disagreed…3yrs3Y

In Canada and the UK, patients often face long waiting times for treatments and surgeries. This could be detrimental for those with serious conditions. How do you propose we ensure quality and timely care under a universal healthcare system?

 @9RHK5N6Alliance from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

Have you ever actually gotten healthcare in Canada or the UK, or are you just parroting what you’ve been told?

When I studied abroad in the UK several years ago, I had to go to the hospital twice. Both of those visits (at two different hospitals, by the way) were quicker than any hospital visit I’ve had back home in the States, and they did every single test onsite that day instead of having to refer me offsite and making me wait several more weeks just to get tests done, which is what the US is like now.

In what world do you live in where our current healthcare system in the US is fast and efficient with short wait times?

 @9FJFPRC from Oregon  disagreed…3yrs3Y

It is the government's responsibility to protect all Americans. Denying healthcare for any reason is a predatory behavior in a system where there is no alternative.

 @9F8BQQZRepublican from Nevada  disagreed…3yrs3Y

There are certain Pre-existing Conditions that should be covered no matter what so the government should get involved to regulate it.

 @9F86SXP from Connecticut  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Restricting coverage on pre-existing conditions will cause much harm to sick people and cause them to not get treatment for their illnesses. Everyone at some point will develop a pre-existing condition; allowing insurers to deny coverage to them will put their health and finances at great risk.

 @9F9HPJTRepublican from Texas  disagreed…3yrs3Y

They should be involved in health insurance because some people don't have the money or are poor and can't always pay for health insurance because it can get quiet expensive.

 @9F7NJZ3 from Virginia  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Most of the time its not the fault of the individual that has the pre existing condition that they have

 @9F6ZVZ3 from Alabama  disagreed…3yrs3Y

A health insurance provider should not be allowed to deny someone based on a prior condition. I believe this should be included in the American's with disabilities act because they should be able to get the same benifits and coverage as an able-bodied individual.

 @9G5BXPR from South Carolina  disagreed…3yrs3Y

A large population of the United States wouldn't be able to afford basic healthcare for conditions that they didn't want

 @9F4TQRH from Arizona  disagreed…3yrs3Y

They should be involved in health insurance because some people don't have the money or are poor and can't always pay for health insurance because it can get quiet expensive.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...