Try the political quiz
+

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

7 Replies

  @Yaunti2  from New York  disagreed…3yrs3Y

The 2nd amendment protects gun ownership, but it doesn't prevent regulations for public safety. And buybacks can reduce the number of guns in circulation, potentially reducing gun violence.

 @BCYDFMC  from Washington  disagreed…2mos2MO

The main reason I've seen for people wishing to buy back or ban guns is to "reduce gun violence." Ask yourself this: if you were planning something horrible, say, breaking into a house and killing your ex, would a ban on guns or fewer guns in circulation stop you from getting one? No, probably not, the black market already sells military-grade weaponry, and it wouldn't be a stretch to assume that you're going to be able to get some sort of firearm. All in all, banning or buying back guns doesn't reduce gun violence; if anything, it increases the potential quality…  Read more

 @9FBXPCZ from Hawaii  agreed…3yrs3Y

The people have the right to protect themselves. Look at Russia for what happens when the government is the only one who has guns. Look at Ukraine for the benefits of an armed population. Ukrainians are now able to defend themselves from the Russians while the Russian protestors are being “disappeared” by the government.

 @9F85M6R from Nevada  agreed…3yrs3Y

The Constitution provides the right to bear arms. Forcing somebody to give their gun to the government is a clear and obvious violation of the Second Amendment.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...