Try the political quiz
@B84QHZF Agreements8mos ago

Firstly, facial recognition would help catch criminals, help reduce future crime, and help track criminals

Say if a criminal is walking down the street, facial recognition software can identify who that person is. It would show if they have any criminal background, any felonies, or past criminal history. If we were to use facial recognition software, the way that it would help reduce future crime is by scanning to see if anything or anyone near has a bad history. If they do, they could keep an eye on them just in case. Lastly, it could be used to track criminals by scanning all the cameras around and seeing if the person has been identified in any photos or videos.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about National security?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Reply

 @B84VVBP from Ohio  disagreed…8mos8MO

Facial recognition software is not that accurate and there are many ways of discerning criminality. Also, the software surveils everyone and is not targeted and nothing substitutes for proper police work

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

@B84QHZF

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias60%Active in
Counter Arguments  1 Disagreements  1 Agreements  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies