Try the political quiz
@B86N72L Agreements8mos ago

it isn't about the government when a mother decides she physicaly can not take care of her so to be child

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Social Issues?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

19 Replies

 @B6ZQKCBWorking Family  from Washington  disagreed…8mos8MO

It’s not about the government, it’s about murdering an infant for the sake of inconvenience. The adoption system should be reformed so more unwanted children can find new families easier

 @B893XTK from Virginia  disagreed…8mos8MO

The fact of the matter is that she is pregnant. There is a human growing inside of her whether her circumstance is favorable or not. It is her responsibility to allow the child to have a chance at life, and if she isn't able to support her child once they are born, then she should put her child up for adoption.

 @B893RLV from Georgia  disagreed…8mos8MO

Rape, or Insest, and death are reasons for abortion and if you can't take care of your so to be child then there are limitations that should be inplace for that.

 @B88TYY5Democrat from New Jersey  disagreed…8mos8MO

abortion shall be allowed if you can't not take care of the baby for income reasons or even for rape and etc. It should be allowed. Unless If you and your partner intentionally did the deed and wanted a baby but then u don't. then it shouldn't be allowed.

 @B8B3V8D  from Minnesota  commented…8mos8MO

It is a scientific fact that fetus (latin for offspring) are unique, living, humans and therefore are entitled to Life, Liberty, and Property by the 14th amendment. They cannot be aborted then as that would violate the 14th amendment regardless of situation.

 @B8B6Q2JRepublican from Mississippi  disagreed…8mos8MO

If you cannot take care of a child, want a child, are responsibly enough to have a child, then do not have sex. I think sex is misused a lot in our society.

 @B8BJJCM from Colorado  disagreed…8mos8MO

Correct, it isn't about the government. It is only about the life of the child, and the life of the mother. We need to support life. Civilizations that support life, and not death, will survive. Or our civilization will cease to exist.

 @B88XNVZ from Minnesota  disagreed…8mos8MO

If she cannot take care of the child, she should not have done what you have to do to bear a child. She could also give the child to the fire department or put it up for adoption.

 @B892ZTM from Iowa  disagreed…8mos8MO

I think it is a horrible thing and that we should limit the people that can do it. Why is that babies life mean less than yours.

 @B8CZW6QRepublican from North Carolina  disagreed…7mos7MO

I believe that there are enough outlets in the US, such as the US foster care system, and just the general community around most people, that abortion is never the right option, even if she physically can not take care of her so to be a child. The only time for this is if it will kill the mother during birth.

 @B8C9483Republican from California  disagreed…7mos7MO

If she can not take care of the child, she should give the child up for adoption, anything but cold blooded murder of an innocent being.

 @B8CXCKWRepublican from Ohio  disagreed…7mos7MO

If you can’t take care of your child you should have known that before you did something you can’t take back, and even if you do you can still put the child up for adoption.

 @B88ZQ6X from Massachusetts  disagreed…8mos8MO

The government has a vested interest in protecting the lives of vulnerable members of society. Life begins at conception.

 @B89ZS33 from Texas  disagreed…8mos8MO

De igual manera le estas quitando la posibilidad de una vida existir, por algo existen Los preservativos y planes para evitar un embarazo, las personas se embarazan porque quieren no porque fue un error, ya depende de como sea esto, va aifluir en lo que llamaremos un problema en El futuro.

 @B88TCQRPeace and Freedom from Kansas  disagreed…8mos8MO

You should've been more responsible and thought about whether or not you could've taken care of a child before having one.

 @B8926LNIndependent from Indiana  disagreed…8mos8MO

That usually doesn't exist. Women's bodies are extremely extraordinary and capable. And outside the womb if you can't take care of the baby there are options out there.

 @B8D7BKH from Massachusetts  disagreed…7mos7MO

I think the government should have a say in whether a mother can physically take care of a child, but should 100% listen to the mothers needs.

 @B88TYJP from Illinois  disagreed…8mos8MO

She should not get an abortion. If she can't take care of it, then put it up for adoption at the very least.

 @B88WGGD from Kansas  disagreed…8mos8MO

The Child's life is not your choice and the child has the right to live whether the mother wants it or not.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

@B86N72L

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias87%Active in
Agreements  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies