Try the political quiz
+

10 Replies

 @B8SGLW6Socialistfrom Maine  agreed…7mos7MO

The police should not be viewed as a threat but instead a safe and supportive system to help people.

 @B8QNKD5Women’s Equality  from Georgia  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree. The role of police is community protection, not combat. When officers have military-grade equipment without the same level of training or accountability, it can increase fear and escalate situations instead of calming them. Prioritizing de-escalation and community trust should come before militarization.

 @B8QQ8R4 from California  agreed…7mos7MO

I believe that. This is right, because the police are known to protect people, and not hurt people. In some cases were people qualify police and military, and then make some thing that they have to use military equipment, but because military training is way. Far. More details. The police training they know how to use the military equipment correctly, then comparing it to a police officer.

 @B8Q4FXNVeteran from Kentucky  agreed…7mos7MO

The police are an organization that was created to carry out justice fairly but people forget that they were created when people of color weren't treated as people they were as property and that is why some of the other races are uneducated, incarcerated, and scared to walk out of their own homes because at this point they aren't stopping the problems they are causing them and giving them military grade weapons to cause more chaos than they already do is not a good thing like how sometimes a protest can be peaceful until they bring out their weapons and come looking for a fight just cause they can and no one thinks to stop them.

 @B8R6P44 from Arkansas  agreed…7mos7MO

Getting a job as a police officer is easier than getting a job in the military, training too. we want the police force to protect us, military equipment would be even more lethal when used incorrectly and sinc theres a lot of incidents like that we should not allow that (tmilitary equip)

 @B8QR2DHIndependent from Florida  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree. they do not have the training nor additional knowledge critical for handling mass machinery.

 @B8SK3K7 from North Carolina  agreed…7mos7MO

The debate ultimately centers on whether the benefits of equipping police for the rarest, most extreme threats outweigh the costs of potentially encouraging a militarized approach to everyday policing and eroding public trust.

Would you like to know more about the 1033 Program that facilitates the transfer of this equipment, or the history of how police militarization began?

 @B8RMT38 from Missouri  agreed…7mos7MO

The police are there to protect people, and not hurt people, police training is not as detailed as military training and because of this, police should not have access to military equipment.

 @B8QN5F4  from Indiana  disagreed…7mos7MO

Police should have access to military equipment if civilians can with how prominent shootings sadly are nowadays I think it'd be safer for them to try and be relatively more well equipped than what most shooters carry nowadays.

 @B8QYRJR from California  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree with this especially since the police can be corrupt or misuse the equipment given to them creating harmful situations and areas in communities.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias64%Audience bias18%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown