First I would like to say why are we talking about something from over 100 years ago and focus on encouraging accepting differences than showcasing exactly how people were appressed exclusively without factoring the entire world at the moment like we do in world history and U.S. history and actively encourage understanding everything in that time period rather than focusing on an out of touch element which encourages division between races and factor the total and also see the progress to this day with the many social strides to make racism as minor as is and stop making it an 1 side vs another.

The most logical counter argument is that in America today there is nothing a white man can do that a black man can't. Instead of using our past for us to learn were lingering on it and trying to make kids believe there are different when they are the exact same. I personally believe CRT is racist

No, racism is not coming from government subsidies. It is not necessary for children to be taught critical race theory to be taught in school.

no i don't agree, because they shouldn't be talking about racism at their age. it should be taught once there old enough to decide for themselves on what opinion they have.

As shown on the cover of time magazine, it is scientifically proven that two different sets of DNA don't look different due to the race of the person. This proves that race is actually a social construct created by the people. It therefore doesn't need to be taught in schools.

I have no counter argument because I agree with this do not hide the history of racism you should know the truth as it could help your future.

Understanding systematic racism is one of the essential gateways of comprehending how our country runs. Whether you can agree or not, this country was built upon the backs of both immigrant and slave labour. These marginalised individuals who have contributed so much to the country as a whole are still chained to inequality, oppression, and injustice, whether done deliberately or discreetly. The very same people who have bled for this country, whether by serving in the military, or taking to the streets to fight for their rights as well as others, continue to remain on an unequal standing wit…  Read moreh the majority. Even those who are privileged enough to find success in their lives are compelled to abandon their core beliefs in order to "fully" integrate into a society structured to hegemonise them. Ever since America was founded, it was, in the words of Stephen A. Douglass, "Made by white men for white men." This quote makes significant reflections of the main tenets of White supremacy, rooted in the belief that the goverment was established to benefit white men. Not black men, not brown men, but white men exclusively. His quote, however, has more to it than just reflections of white supremacy. He also emphasises that citizenship must only be granted to white men of European descent. This was an incredibly powerful view during the 19th century, where systemic racism was especially rampant. Nativists teamed with government officials in order to curb the legal rights of immigrants as well as other marginalised groups at the time, such as Catholics, the Irish, Chinese immigrants, freed Blacks, and anyone that did not fit into their universal criteria for so-called "whiteness". With the one drop rule, which declared any person with just one drop of black ancestry to be considered entirely black, as well as the prevalence of scientific racism (Social Darwinism, which has been debunked more times than the whole "The South engaged in the Civil War because they wanted States rights! argument) and Rudyard Kipling's "White Men's Burden" poem, used to justify colonisation and imperialism of otherwise sovereign nations in order to spread "civility" and "humanity" to them. Sharecropping, for example, was slavery, masked under a new name. This system was strategically made in order to keep Black families dependent on their "employers", rather, their masters. Unsuprisingly, many of these families were working for their former masters despite being granted emancipation with the end of the Civil War. At this same time, Black Codes were established, and unconstitutional court rulings effectively reduced legal rights and protections for Black people. I would even go as far as to argue that their newfound status as "freedmen" were no better than the former lives they had led under bondage. For what is freedom to the freedman, when he is still denied equal life opportunities compared to his white counterparts? What is freedom if racism, which intrudes all sections of your daily affairs, remains a permanent affliction?

I have no argument? I agree that CRT and intersectionality should be addressed in educational systems because it's vital. Hold your own personal opinions, but it's necessary to prevent hate crime and racially motivated inequities in society. It's not a 'sensitive' topic to discuss, nor is it something to avoid. It's a privilege to avoid talking about it. White children go about in school learning while many children of colour are bullied for how they look--with no explanation on why, and no enforcement in classrooms that explain why it's important to understand the meanings behind these structural behavours in societal environments.

No kids should not be taught critical race theory people are not born racist they are brainwashed by the media and the media puts people against each other. The only way to stop racism is to completely stop talking about it and treat everyone by their personality not by the color of their skin.

I do not agree with this everyone has the same rights but a lot from other “skin colors” seem to think they don’t because they’re “disadvantaged” or “discriminated” against