Try the political quiz
@B9PPTBBAgreements5mos ago

If there were cameras with facial recognition the government would be able to watch over any individual they want infringing on our rights to privacy. If someone speaks out against the government over an unfair policy/law, then the government could hypothetically unalive that person. Also, there would be no way of knowing if the government is using the technology with ill intent. Furthermore, if a foreign criminal was able to hack into the system and utilize facial recognition they could track our political and military leaders leading to classified information they could sell to other countries. Lastly, having this kind of technology could lead to even greater infringes on our rights. What's stopping the government from integrating this technology into the police/military force and killing people because the system tells them to? Or integrating it into the medical field and the paramedics refusing service towards someone because their insurance can't pay for their medical expenses?

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about National security?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

No replies yet…

Be the first to reply to this agreement.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

@B9PPTBB

Last activeActivity4 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias0%Active in
Foreign policy  1 Counter Arguments  1 Answers  1 Disagreements  1 Military Spending  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies