Try the political quiz
+

12 Replies

 @BBHSYKM from Georgia  agreed…4mos4MO

what if someone stole your bike, and turned it into a car for someone else, and you never get paid for it.

 @BBCVYYJ from Texas  agreed…4mos4MO

A graph shows that people would like the artwork less if it were AI, with 37% saying they would like it less, while 5% say they would like it more. There are many articles saying artists feel overworked and underappreciated because of AI. https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/artists-are-losing-work-wages-and

 @BBDRBYK  from Texas  agreed…4mos4MO

Just because the data is online doesn’t mean it’s free to use however companies want. Paying creators would also encourage more original work instead of discouraging people from creating.

 @BCNBB4J from Texas  disagreed…3mos3MO

While I believe that we shouldn’t be using AI, Having companies be required to pay might discourage them from using others work to train their models.

 @BBCXWJ4 from North Dakota  agreed…4mos4MO

Intellectual property needs to be properly protected, and if we keep allowing big companies to steal from people then nobody will make anything original anymore

 @BBFDK83 from Colorado  agreed…4mos4MO

The rapid deployment of AI leaves little time for workforce retraining or adaptation, causing immediate, severe disruption.

 @BBDFHB2 from Illinois  agreed…4mos4MO

Some people might be willing to use these AI Training data compensation thinking they could get information and use this as a type of source, thinking they’re going to get the right information.

 @BBDCMRN from South Carolina  disagreed…4mos4MO

The advantages range from streamlining, saving time, eliminating biases, and automating repetitive tasks, just to name a few.

 @BBCWDMK from Illinois  agreed…4mos4MO

I believe that people will agreed to having AI training data compensation because it's going to help them get information faster and don't need to take up to much time.

 @BBC2SWRRepublican  from Pennsylvania  disagreed…4mos4MO

Art is a form of expression, and if AI bots are being trained to make that same expression, then it is sort of like copying someone or something.

 @BBCQWT4 from Pennsylvania  agreed…4mos4MO

Art is a form of expression for people, and to use AI to train bots to replicate the senses of emotions that come out of everyday art pieces feels like copying something. There are many artists who live off of getting paid by their art.

  @Lil_EndersProgressive from Maryland  agreed…4mos4MO

There are plenty of resources online about AI using other peoples art and whatnot to be trained, for example studio jubilee's art has been taken to train AI as shown and explained here: https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/03/studio-ghibli-and-other-japanese-publishers-want-openai-to-stop-training-on-their-work/

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...