Try the political quiz
+

2 Replies

 @BCR7FPJ from Illinois  disagreed…2mos2MO

Houston is a clear example that highway expansions fail to serve their intended purpose. They lead suburban expansion and should be dedicated toward more urban development to mitigate traffic and promote the use of greener methods of transportation.

 @BCR4HMPAmerican Solidarityfrom Maine  disagreed…2mos2MO

A strong counter-argument to banning highway expansions is that it can be too rigid and economically harmful in many real-world cases.

Even if highways can induce demand, some regions still genuinely need more road capacity-for example fast-growing suburbs, freight corridors, or areas where public transit is not yet practical or cost- effective. In those cases, banning expansions could lead to worse congestion, higher travel times, and reduced economic productivity, especially for workers who depend on cars.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

Last activeActivity3 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias18%Audience bias11%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown