1

The "Ghost Agency" Problem
Focusing on abolishing agencies is often a legislative dead end. In the U.S. system, most agencies are created by Acts of Congress, meaning a President cannot unilaterally "delete" them.

The Reality of 2025–2026: While the administration has signaled a desire to abolish the Department of Education, the agency still exists because a divided Congress has not passed the repeal.

The Strategic Shift: Instead of waiting for a "ghost agency" to be abolished, the administration has used Executive Order 14171 (reinstated in 2025) to reclassify approximately 50,000 "policy-influencing" employees into the new Schedule Policy/Career (at-will status).

The Data: Data from early 2026 shows that while no major Cabinet department has been fully abolished yet, the workforce at the Department of Education has already shrunk by 42.6% through strategic firings and "deferred resignations." This proves that you can dismantle an agency's power through personnel long before you can dismantle its legal existence.

2. The Massive Net Fiscal Loss of "Institutional Resistance"
One of the strongest arguments for firing staff is the economic cost of a "disengaged" or "resistant" bureaucracy.

Cost of Disengagement: An April 2026 analysis from the Partnership for Public Service estimates that "disengaged" civil servants—those who actively or passively resist the President's policy agenda—cost the U.S. economy more than $53.2 billion in wasted salary and stalled initiatives last year alone.

Return on Removal: Proponents argue that the cost of severance for the 10,000+ employees laid off in 2025 (roughly $764 million) is a "pittance" compared to the tens of billions saved by removing bureaucrats who would otherwise block multi-billion dollar deregulation efforts.

3. The "Accountability" Gap in Agency Abolition
If you abolish an agency but keep the "Schedule F" (civil service) rules intact, the people often just move to other jobs.

The "Absorption" Risk: Under current civil service rules, if an agency is abolished, many employees have "bumping rights" that allow them to displace less senior employees in other agencies.

The Stat: Without the 2025 reclassification, nearly 90% of the staff from an abolished agency would likely have remained on the federal payroll in different departments. Firing "the people" ensures they are actually removed from the system, whereas abolishing "the agency" often just reshuffles the deck.

4. Public Opinion and the 2026 Mandate
Recent data suggests the public cares more about who is in charge than the name of the building they work in.

The Polling (March 2026): A recent survey found that 64% of Americans support the idea that "the President should have the authority to fire any government employee who refuses to carry out their legal directives."

The 2026 Midterm Context: With the 2026 midterms approaching, candidates are campaigning on "Accountability First," arguing that agency abolition is a "distraction" from the immediate need to ensure that the people currently being paid by taxpayers are actually working for the elected leader's goals.