Answers + Science

Yes

▲  160k719 replies13 agree453 disagree

We have the right to our own body and if we are mandated to ge the vaccine then that free choice is being taken away.

Yes

▲  142k83 replies64 agree12 disagree

GMO labels need to be provided to give consumers the option depending on their own needs. In other words, this informati…

Yes

▲  120k509 replies357 agree4 disagree

Nuclear energy is clean, powerful, and reliable. It needs to be de-stigmatized in order for the general public to agree…

No

▲  68.4k404 replies238 agree18 disagree

Some vaccines that children have taken have shown negative effects, like lowering testosterone or other hormones in thei…

No

▲  34.1k288 replies16 agree14 disagree

Nuclear energy is statistically the safest most efficient and most abundant fuel resource currently available to us

No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

▲  20.6k999 replies788 disagree

Nuclear if properly regulated is just as clean and much more efficient, furthermore we're falling behind countries like…

Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food

▲  17.2k3 replies5 agree

Yes

▲  15.2k9 replies9 agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

▲  12k100 replies2 agree58 disagree

i feel like they shouldn't have to get vaccinated because everyone families don't believe in these types of things inclu…

Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

▲  11.9k22 replies2 agree4 disagree

Nuclear energy is extremely clean, especially the thorium type. I find wind turbines and solar panels unreliable and ine…

Yes, and nationalize the industry

▲  10.4k64 replies41 agree4 disagree

Nuclear energy is destroying our planet and should be ban and illegal. It will put irreversible damage to our planet.

No

▲  10k19 replies3 agree17 disagree

The term GMO is loose, but companies should Absolutely be transparent about the processes used for the curation of food.

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

▲  7.6k45 replies32 disagree

Yes, and drastically increase NASA’s current budget

▲  7.5k16 replies6 agree8 disagree

The amount of technology in one’s cellphone, in household products like teflon in pans and more all came from technology…

Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs

▲  7.2k5 replies6 agree1 disagree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

▲  6k26 replies19 disagree

It is a violation of fundamental human freedoms. It is impossible to give informed consent if the procedure is mandato…

Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling the…

▲  4.3k3 replies1 agree1 disagree

No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

▲  3.9k87 replies85 disagree

I think it is important to label foods with GMO or Non GMO because it is important for us to know what we are putting in…

No, we should focus on saving the Earth instead of leaving it

▲  3.9k8 replies7 agree2 disagree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

▲  3.7k50 replies15 agree3 disagree

Vaccinations for public schools should be mandatory, however the Federal and State governments should not enforce vaccin…

Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

▲  3.7k23 replies2 agree2 disagree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

▲  3k29 replies15 agree

No

▲  2.7k23 replies21 disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

▲  2.1k26 replies16 agree

No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

▲  1.8k81 replies1 agree77 disagree

There is no best solution to ending world hunger, but manufacturing food with low nutritional value and more chemicals a…