Try the political quiz

Anti-Immigration

Limiting the influx of foreign nationals will protect domestic jobs, culture, and resources.

Overview Issues Discuss

Anti-Immigration policies on foreign policy issues

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Foreign Policy  ›  Israel

Should the U.S. continue to support Israel?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo, we should not give aid to any foreign nations

Foreign Policy  ›  Mandatory Military Service

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

Foreign Policy  ›  NATO

Should the U.S. remain in NATO?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Foreign Policy  ›  United Nations

Should the U.S. remain in the United Nations?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, but scale back our current involvement

Foreign Policy  ›  Foreign Aid

Should the US increase or decrease foreign aid spending?

AI>AI  ChatGPTDecrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries

How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Immigration issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Foreign Policy  ›  Military Spending

Should the United States increase or decrease military spending?

AI>AI  ChatGPTIncrease

Foreign Policy  ›  Terrorism

Should foreign terrorism suspects be given constitutional rights?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

Foreign Policy  ›  Torture

Should the military be allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, to gain information from suspected terrorists?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism

Foreign Policy  ›  Foreign Elections

Should the government attempt to influence foreign elections?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

Foreign Policy  ›  Drones

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

Foreign Policy  ›  Ukraine and Nato

Should Ukraine join NATO?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo, there is too much corruption in Ukraine

Foreign Policy  ›  NATO

Should the U.S. defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Foreign Policy  ›  North Korea Military Strikes

Should the U.S. conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

Foreign Policy  ›  NSA Surveillance

Should the U.S. continue NSA surveillance of its allies?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes, surveillance of all foreign countries is essential to tracking potential terrorist threats

Foreign Policy  ›  Cuba

Do you support President Obama’s move to lift the trade and travel embargo on Cuba?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo

Foreign Policy  ›  Jerusalem

Should Jerusalem be recognized as the capital of Israel?

AI>AI  ChatGPTYes

Foreign Policy  ›  F-35

Should the government cancel production of the F-35 fighter?

AI>AI  ChatGPTNo

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies