Try the political quiz
+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Climate Change

Answer Overview

Response rates from 10.8m America voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 10.8m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 10.8m America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9D5GR6M from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

 @4YTBLYBfrom Texas  answered…6yrs6Y

Yes, but not for climate change. I think that is unfounded for several contradicting reasons from both sides of the issue. However, the human toll through cancer causing agents is alarming and should have been addressed with more importance years ago.

 @4YRY8PGfrom Nevada  answered…6yrs6Y

government needs to regulate the pollution of the planet, not just for climate change; saving the planet is unnecessary, the planet will save itself. However, humans are capable of making the earth inhabitable for themselves.

 @9D84HDR from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

 @4YW99PVfrom Indiana  answered…6yrs6Y

No evidence that CO2 is the dominant factor. Climate has changed relatively little in the past several decades. Almost all predictions for the amount of change have been wrong.

 @9D6QLWZ from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

 @5DVLBZWfrom Indiana  answered…6yrs6Y

This question is wrong, as the real problem has always been corruption/cronyism and failure to enforce property rights. Regulations are written by cronies more to the benefit of polluters than to our environment or property owners. Regulations have actually made it harder to sue those who harm our shared/un-owned resources, stealing property value, health and life.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Climate Change” news articles, updated frequently.

About This Data

Based on 10.8m responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should the government increase environmental regulations to prevent climate change?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.isidewith.com/poll/734977926

Embed The Live Result

Preview