Yes

Women are competent and should have equal rights with men. Women who go through the training shouldn't be denied just because of their gender, they like all people should only be denied if they are not suitable and haven't undergone training.

If people are truly concerned about this being a problem, people who enter the military, including men, should take a course for sexual assault. This would also be beneficial because men being raped by other men has happened in military history. Though, people should not have to be cautious around women because of this, they should be treated equally and be able to serve in any form or combat they wish. If someone were to rape someone else they should be kicked out and charged if the victim wishes. If a woman were to get pregnant from sexual assault in the military then the criminal should pay child care until the child is 18, if they decide to have the child, and should pay the medical bills if they choose to get an abortion.

Referred to the past 50 years of sexual assault statistics in the military deployment, statistics, comparing overseas deployment and stateside sexual assault statistics, and it does not bear out an increase

Research from the U.S. military shows that women who meet gender‑neutral combat standards perform at the same level as men, and real‑world data supports this. For example, women have graduated from elite programs like Army Ranger School, and studies from the Marine Corps found that women successfully completed over 90% of required combat tasks when held to identical standards. More than 30 countries already allow women in combat roles with no evidence of reduced effectiveness or readiness. Allowing qualified women to serve strengthens the military by expanding the talent pool and ensuring that the most capable individuals—regardless of gender—can contribute to national defense.

Women should be able to have the choice in what they wanna do with there life and if that means risking it in combat so be it. It was their choice and women's life choices should not be determined by men that clearly feel threatened and overpowered by a women's with higher intelligence and skills.

I don't know much solid data on this issue but I think that if the military has a job to do then they need to put their best people on it to be successful. To me is all about the numbers. If a person can pass the physical requirements to excel in a combat role then send them to the battlefield where they can best serve their country.

If they feel like they are as stong as they say they are the should be able to fight alongside with guys.

Many times, women have proven to have a persistence, even in cases greater than that of men, for the same reason that women can be in combat and serve their country.

Women and men are put through the same combat training and do the same routine. they are held to the same standards when training. if they go to the same forts as men then why cant they have combat roles?