Dealers do have the responsibility of conducting background checks on the persons to whom they sell firearms, but there is no reasonable expectation that they can gain complete insight into the mind and mental state of their clients. As far as I am concerned, the dealer should only be liable to be sued if they either did not properly comply with background check laws/guidelines or if there is substantial evidence to show that the client (who used the guns to cause violence) was acting in a way that can be deemed suspicious, but the dealer did not take action or deny the sale.
@9GKJQCJ 7mos7MO
When it comes to guns they're should be a new age restriction, so instead of 18 it's raised to 23 but you'll need a license and if you use your gun for bad your license gets revoked. And an inspector should come around once a month to make sure your using it carefully.
@9GKJDNCRepublican7mos7MO
I agree But The Dealership is responsibile for background checks but they dont know what the buyer will do with it
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
