Try the political quiz
@9GKGKQ2 DisagreementsCounter Arguments3yrs ago

I would actually somewhat agree with this answer, but only to a certain extent

Dealers do have the responsibility of conducting background checks on the persons to whom they sell firearms, but there is no reasonable expectation that they can gain complete insight into the mind and mental state of their clients. As far as I am concerned, the dealer should only be liable to be sued if they either did not properly comply with background check laws/guidelines or if there is substantial evidence to show that the client (who used the guns to cause violence) was acting in a way that can be deemed suspicious, but the dealer did not take action or deny the sale.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Domestic Policy?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Counter Argument?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

2 Replies

 @9GKJQCJ disagreed…3yrs3Y

When it comes to guns they're should be a new age restriction, so instead of 18 it's raised to 23 but you'll need a license and if you use your gun for bad your license gets revoked. And an inspector should come around once a month to make sure your using it carefully.

 @9GKJDNCRepublican from Kentucky  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree But The Dealership is responsibile for background checks but they dont know what the buyer will do with it

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@9GKGKQ2

Last activeActivity5 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active in
Counter Arguments  3 Disagreements  3 Agreements  2
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies