Try the political quiz
 @Patriot-#1776ConstitutionComments2yrs ago

Then why has the contract you speak of never been handed to me to sign?

I never recall agreeing to allow the government to steal my money without permission. Show me this document.

+
Expand

2 Replies

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  commented…2yrs2Y

That’s the rules of the land, the social contract isn’t tangible, just as a nation or national borders aren’t. As you are a citizen in this land, you pay taxes, that’s the law, and was agreed upon by the people as a whole. If a vast majority agrees on no taxes ever, then it’ll probably happen, and, thankfully, it hasn’t. Though the constitution itself id not a contract, it does establish the rules of the law of the land, and as stated in article 1, section 8, clause 1,

“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excise…  Read more

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Notice the Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, etc, ONLY to pay off debts, and ONLY if such benefits the General Welfare of the United States as a whole, and ONLY if they are UNIFORM throughout the United States... let me then ask, is progressive income taxation, that charges higher rates for higher income, in ANY WAY uniform? No, it's the opposite of uniform. So regardless of the 16th Amendment, that has not been changed. The 16th Amendment authorises only a FLAT INCOME TAX, where all brackets pay the same right. IF you support progressive taxation, not only is that not listed in the Constitution, it's EXPLICITLY FORBIDDEN by the Constitution. It's not just un-constitutional, it's anti-constitutional, and subversive of every principle of liberty and free markets.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

@Patriot-#1776

Last activeActivity1,934 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias98%Audience bias46%Active in
Comments  1255 Disagreements  371 Answers  172 Agreements  66 URLs  32
PartyConstitutionLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies