Try the political quiz
+

13 Replies

 @BDS9H57 from Washington  agreed…1mo1MO

i believe that diesel emission would affect their health from the illness and lung damage, diesel pollution would also affect the environment.

 @BDJKDCJ from West Virginia  agreed…1mo1MO

The diesel emissions controlling equiptment installed on vehicles makes the lifespan of the engine significantly shorter than an engine with no emission controlling equiptment.

 @BDJJNKL from Arkansas  agreed…1mo1MO

Diesel is the best creation known to man kind. Just because of the horse power ability, and the capability of diesel engines.

 @BDGQRTJ from Montana  agreed…2mos2MO

They are the most efficient way to transport large quantities of anything. Also global warming and emissions are not a huge issue.

 @BDD6MWX from Texas  agreed…2mos2MO

we have to have specific things on your truck even if you don't want it or it coast you more to fix do to the standards

 @BDD43V5Progressive from Utah  agreed…2mos2MO

Taylor and everyone else putting jet fuel in the air is much worse than deleted diesel also DEF is horrible for the enviorment

 @BDCTY5M from Alabama  agreed…2mos2MO

Diesel has been through a lot with certain things but they also need to have strict things within it

 @BD9Y5TZ from Connecticut  agreed…2mos2MO

The EGR brings exhaust gases back through the intake to power the car. it builds up unbelievable amounts of soot that rapidly damages your vehicle and if not fixed quickly can become a super expensive fix. The engine literally is told to slowly kill itself just to stop a small amount of exhaust gases.

 @BD5V7R5No Labels from Georgia  agreed…2mos2MO

If we implement stricter emissions standards for diesel vehicles it will bring up the price of goods, we rely heavily diesel trucks to trasport goods. if we make emissions standards sticter for diesel vehicles it will raise the cost to manufacture diesel vehicles that are the back bone of our economy.

 @BCVHFM2Democrat from California  agreed…2mos2MO

Arguments for relaxing diesel emissions often focus on reducing operational costs, improving engine reliability, and enhancing fuel efficiency. Supporters argue that strict emission control systems are expensive to maintain, complex, and hinder optimal engine performance. Additionally, some note that diesel engines are naturally more fuel-efficient, offering better fuel economy compared to gasoline.

 @BDSF979 from Oregon  agreed…1mo1MO

diesel produces less emissions yearly than lithium mining globally and is recyclable unlike lithium and it shortens the life span of the engines if they are being restricted more and more

 @BD8TX6NRepublican from Ohio  agreed…2mos2MO

The DEF system is terrible for reliability power of diesel engines also the Diesel exhaust fluid or DEF is worse for the environment than if there wasn't any emissions system at all. If we get rid of the DEF system it will increase reliability and power and keep consumers happy.

 @BD5B5W4  from California  agreed…2mos2MO

An electric car that gets charged for two hours is getting charged by crude oil from the earth, and we will not run out of it

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...