These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of
@B9ZQ4GM 4mos4MO
Artificial proteins and carbohydrates have been shown, every time, to decrease the health of anyone who ingests them.
@BB2MZ6MRepublican 4mos4MO
With the use of lab grown meat we reduce animal abuse and the overuse of cattle farms. With the use of cattle farms there a large amount of greenhouse gasses that radiate from that. Although I do agree with the use of real meat and not lab grown meat. I believe that there should be more regulations for cattle farms so the animals aren't living in torture but we should be eating real meat.
@BB2RG7LProgressive4mos4MO
@BB2CH5P4mos4MO
@BB2Y9BF4mos4MO
@BCVYLRKRepublican 2mos2MO
You do not know what is being processed with your meat. How much those machine are being clean. What chemicals are being made with your meat.
A lot of these same arguments could be made for the way meat is cleaned/prepared today. It's not like a guy is just walking up to a dead cow and stripping it for parts like a hunter with a deer, it's a highly automated process that involved many machines, many people, many chemicals and I would be shocked by anybody claiming they could name every step and material used in the process. The best counterargument to non lab grown meat would simply be price. I see stew meat, a relatively "bad" cut of meat being sold for 9.99 per pound. Lab grown meat would increase supply, thus… Read more
@BCXTJBN2mos2MO
@BCY72DF 2mos2MO
Sterile vs. Biological Environments: Traditional slaughterhouses are hotbeds for bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella because animals naturally carry them. Lab-grown meat is produced in "clean rooms"—sterile, pharmaceutical-grade environments—which virtually eliminates the risk of foodborne illness and fecal contamination.
@BCYMF4T2mos2MO
@BBZ24GQ 3mos3MO
Effects of consumption of newer products and drugs often take decades to show themselves in the form of cancer and other illnesses.
@BBZQGX73mos3MO
@BB86DLX 4mos4MO
@BC9DB77 3mos3MO
There was a time when cigarettes were prescribed as a medical supplement- Americans are no strangers to the lack of research into fields, especially when it comes to food and health.
@BCBHKD53mos3MO
Claims of cigarettes being prescribed as a medical supplement were largely responsible due to a lack of research or certified officials bought out by companies to promote these products. These are two different time periods, as of today we have significantly changed in technologies than before, but the looming threat of cooperate greed is still there to potentially control the market. Which is why stricter regulations and actions to free the market against these threats should be implemented to rebuild that trust that has been lost. Lab Grown Meats can serve as an alternative food when resources are scarce.
@B9RC794 5mos5MO
We need more long term studies to ensure safety of lab grown meat because manufacturing muscle fibers of a living animal by the use a machine is under-studied and mysterious in a way that we are unaware of
@B9TY9K7Peace and Freedom5mos5MO
@B9T2XFJ5mos5MO
@B9SS5L7 5mos5MO
I agree with that statement. I feel lab grown meat could help our current issues with our growing population and diminishing livestock and meat industry, with disclosure, I believe it could benefit. However I foresee an issue with not knowing enough about it for it to be commercialized quite yet, I feel in the next decade potentially. But not soon, and not without disclosure of what it is and knowledge of how it's made and will affect you and the environment. It has shown to use more resources than ranching and raising livestock for meat ever has which can have very negative impacts.
@B9SMJRF5mos5MO
@BBS83RV4mos4MO
@BC4777H3mos3MO
@BC9C82S3mos3MO
@BC3RZST3mos3MO
I understand that killing animals to eat them can reduce the amount we have in the country but to go in a lab and make fake meat with chemicals we don't know about is not right. If the county still wants to sell lab grown meat, they should say that on the packing to inform the people and not keep them blind-sided.
@BD9ZGN92mos2MO
Lab grown meat can open roads to new technologies, constantly advancing society and making up for food shortages as the population expands. It should be clearly labeled when sold, however. and there should be a great investment of affects and take years to even get into the market since it is an unknown then that will allow for public opinion to accept it. if it is safe to eat it would be a subtiution for what is the slaughter of animals
@B8V8QSK6mos6MO
@B838H4Z8mos8MO
@B8DLWXVRepublican 7mos7MO
@BD53FW7Republican2mos2MO
We need a lot of long-term studies on this new form of creating meat because of its untrustworthiness of people and the way it's made. It would be like trying to get everyone in the world to switch to electric cars all at once, even though research says electric car parts aren't doing that much better at protecting the environment than gas fueled cars. We also need to test this more because of the potential risk it could have on our body and what it could taste like, or the texture, or the cost it'll take to make something like that, or the amount of people that would distrust something like that.
@BB6B9JH4mos4MO
@B9ZH2674mos4MO
@B9Y7PNF4mos4MO
@BCZC74R2mos2MO
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7020248/
"Although these are not yet known, we speculated on the potential health benefits and drawbacks of cultured meat."
This, coming from a 2020 scientific study on lab-grown meat, should not be enough evidence for the FDA to call lab-grown meat safe.
"On the other hand, with this high level of cell multiplication, some dysregulation is likely as happens in cancer cells. Likewise, the control of its nutritional composition is still unclear, especially for micronutrients and iron."
@BCJMZBR3mos3MO
Although lab grown meat has passed initial regulatory safety assessments, many scientists argue that long-term studies are still necessary. Because it is a novel food produced using growth media, bioreactors, and engineered cell lines, there is limited data on long-term human consumption. Research highlights potential concerns including chemical residues, contamination risks during large-scale production, and the absence of historical dietary exposure, all of which justify continued study before widespread adoption. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224423002091?utm_source=chatgpt.com
@BC58RVX3mos3MO
@BBV5KZB3mos3MO
@BB97G6Y4mos4MO
Lab Grown Meat is still in development, you don't want to ingest something that has only recently been researched. Lab Grown Meat could have detrimental side effects. Although I believe that looking for an alternative to the violent and inhumane meat industry is needed, there needs to be great caution; because, we are putting the lives of millions at stake.
@B9YX2T74mos4MO
@BC4489H3mos3MO
@BD9478F2mos2MO
@BC33L543mos3MO
@BB956QG4mos4MO
@BCQ2D6V2mos2MO
@BCNGTDK2mos2MO
@BCHRQTK3mos3MO
@BB4K4884mos4MO
No, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety. Due to the fact that it isn't safe if someone tampers with the meat, and people eat bad meat that may end up spreading a disease. In the end we need more studies to ensure the safety of eating lab produced meat, and I will say this again. Actual meat is healthier and we just need to pay farmers more in order for people to start farms and raise cows, chickens, etc. To be able to not rely on technology to make food from DNA.
@BB4DVLHIndependent4mos4MO
we should not be ingesting something without doing proper resource into are body's also it is manmade not from the ground or the earth or from a cattle it is processed and fake and who knows what kind of chemicals are put into it to be able to be digested but there more than likely not good for you.
@BB4C77D4mos4MO
@B9WL4NB5mos5MO
Lab grown meat was created only 13 years ago in 2013. This doesn’t give enough time for us to test its effects long-term, specially taking into account long-term testing didn’t start right away. This plus the power it gives corporations to not only regulate prices but also to cut corners in the future could create a dangerous future where we eat poison disguised as food in the name of affordability.
@B8WP65H6mos6MO
@B8LC6LR7mos7MO
@B8K2S6H7mos7MO
@B8GHLL27mos7MO
@BD2X9VS2mos2MO
@BBTX9BC3mos3MO
@BB3FSJF4mos4MO
@B9C2P465mos5MO
@B8NV9BD7mos7MO
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=25228723bdaa8d136844f016c5f76f94b752c81738032ad869fbf7eeef9b2171JmltdHM9MTc2NDAyODgwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=341ca18e-b93b-6357-0c33-b7eab8db62a7&psq=problems+with+lab+grown+meat&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly90YWNvbWFlbmNvdW50ZXIub3JnL25ld3MvYS1jcml0aWNhbC1leGFtaW5hdGlvbi1vZi1oaWRkZW4taGVhbHRoLWlzc3Vlcy1pbi1sYWItZ3Jvd24tbWVhdC8
accoording to this site, genetically modified soy leghemoglobin (slh) is used to mmimic the meat taste, which could be harmful.
@B8NTH237mos7MO
@B8LTKPJPeace and Freedom7mos7MO
@BD8RR352mos2MO
I have little trust in the FDA as the US has been letting ingrediants in food for years that have been banned in other countries. Essentially, they have willingly been poisoning people slowly. They will continue to do the same with any new foods regardless if it's safe or not, however, I think more studies should be done so that the consumer can make an informed choice as it ultimately falls on the consumer to do so within the US.
@BBR9DMT4mos4MO
@B9YQ6L54mos4MO
@B9XRGPM4mos4MO
@B8FMPQ67mos7MO
@B84NLLP8mos8MO
@B7YZ236Republican8mos8MO
@BBVT34WLibertarian3mos3MO
@BBJWLZC4mos4MO
@BF3RM67 1 day1D
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.