Yes, but with very strict oversight and regulations

A dangerous A.I. system can still arise in a situation with strict oversight; it would be better to not take any risks.

AI is the so bad for the planet, so that alone is horrible and should immediately take it out of consideration

AI destroys the environment and so does war. Both elements are responsible for the detriment of human beings and the world at large. I cannot imagine the damage that a collaboration like that would do.

I believe that AI has become too self sufficient to be regulated. Due to this, we should completely get rid of Artificial Intelligence.

I think AI should not be a thing, but I know that is impossible, so I think it should not be accessible for public use.

In its present state, the federal government cannot be trusted to regulate something as vague and controversial as AI for use in critical defense applications. If most of our government officials are yes-men to a president whose bread and butter is conflict of interest, how can we trust the logic and decision-making process of proprietary algorithms awarded contracts for financial benefit over merit and accuracy? We have seen what AI can and cannot do in driverless taxis, which already have government oversight at the municipal level and go through extensive testing. Let me ask, would you hand a loaded gun to the same error-prone machine?

Artificial Intelligence can be very unpredictable and sometimes can lead to malfunctions easily. And while strict oversight seems right, society can't lean on technology too much.

There is not enough evidence and testing done with satisfactory results for me to trust AI with such a sensitive task especially with how many mistakes it makes.

Even with very strict oversight and regulations, a real person manning the defense will be better than an AI at present, and the AI will inevitably make mistakes, which could have been prevented or would have been less likely to happen if a person were in charge of the defense.

Ai can not show any sort of human feeling or such, no ai will be able to mimic the human brain as well as ¨get smarter¨

AI will never reach a level where it can live with conscience, a conscience of its actions, and learn to correct them based on how the world responds in real time.

No, AI is meant in personal life, and should have no diction in the protection of the United States.

Artificial intelligence should be less commonplace in all workplaces until it is regulated further. This applies especially to branches of government, assuming they don´t have more technologically advance AI at their disposal.

AI should not be used for defense. Defense should be controlled by humans, because what if the AI malfunctions?

Even with strict oversight and regulations, AI has clearly been shown to be deficient in most areas besides writing essays, and the degree of oversight, regulations, and re-doing and re-writing would likely equate to more work than not using AI in the first place.

AI is not entirely accurate and is still a new and improving technology and we should double check for any mistakes.

I hate AI with every fiber of my being, anyone who uses AI is a supreme dumbass and I hate that I am forced to use this AI-riddled website for a school project.

A computer algorithm that hasn't been perfected should not be responsible for American lives more than an actual human.

AI is not a safe or secure solution to have in this situation. There are too many unknown variables.

If it is not regulated AI can malfunction and do something it is not supposed to causing our defense to be weaker

We should not be furthering the development of AI in general because sufficiently advanced AI is impossible to control and will almost certainly not be aligned with broad human interests. Have you ever seen a being with great intelligence being controlled by a being with lesser intelligence?

I really do not think that AI is going in the right direction. With the way that AI is getting trained with writing, photo/video generating, etc...people will use it in ways that will only benefit someone with evil intentions.

AI is a dangerous tool when in the hands of people that don't understand it's power. Our current administration can not be trusted with AI tools.

AI is vital for the defense of the untied states as in elimates human error and protects america from threats quickly.

Because the environmental costs of AI are ludicrous, and boiling the planet is bad for everyone's safety

With how AI currently is even with strict oversight it could just shoot off a missile into a place randomly by declaring them a "threat". Until AI is more advanced it should remain out of firing weapons.

AI is not as advance as people act like it is, it is still very buggy and could lead to horrible things

AI is nothing but regurgitated online information. If youre a republican, think about Russia, and Chine, how you so strongly believe that they are always listening on devices and stealing and modifying our information. You dont think they would feed our AI's some nonsense that sounds good in theory, but plays exactly into their hands?