The constitution mandates equal protection for individuals and promotes an inclusive, progressive society
Same sex marriage does no harm and only affects individuals who choose to be affected.
Trending News
Here are the top political news stories for today.
17 Replies
@BCB5Z5M3mos3MO
@BCB33JK3mos3MO
@BCB99JZ3mos3MO
@BCB8RH93mos3MO
@BCB86S3 3mos3MO
I agree to this statement because I believe it's none of other peoples' business if someone is having a same sex marriage, there is nothing wrong with it and if religious people like Catholics and Christians have a problem with it just look at the following verses
Psalm 139:13-14: Emphasizes that you are "fearfully and wonderfully made".
Ephesians 2:10: Highlights that you are God’s "workmanship" (or masterpiece), created for a specific purpose.
Jeremiah 1:5: Asserts that God knew and set you apart before you were born.
1 Corinthians 12:4-7: Explains that… Read more
@ChristianGuidedConstitution 1mo1MO
“Notes that while people look at outward appearance, God looks at and values your unique heart.”
Leviticus 18:22 - You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 - If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
Jude 1:7 - Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.
Romans 1:26-28 - For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contr… Read more
@BCBP8WC3mos3MO
@BCB8MW63mos3MO
@BCB7FXR3mos3MO
@BCB5MWN 3mos3MO
@BCB3M6T3mos3MO
@BCB8639Independent3mos3MO
@BC8BPK93mos3MO
Individuals who argue against same sex marriage often are only bothered by it based on their own individual morals, leading them to look to religion and other sources to explain why its wrong even though in actuality it has no impact on their life how someone else chooses to live, especially something as minor as what sex they marry.
@BC9K2383mos3MO
@BC8D56D3mos3MO
@BC8DL3J 3mos3MO
The simplest counter-argument is that marriage is a traditional institution meant specifically to unite a man and a woman for procreation. This view suggests that the government’s main goal is to support a biological mother and father raising their own children. By changing this definition, critics argue the state is moving away from a long-standing social structure that has been the foundation of society for centuries.
Engagement
The historical activity of users engaging with this agreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Demographics
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
More conversations
Join in on more popular conversations.






