Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsInfrastructureEnergy PolicyPublic UtilitiesElectric GridNationalization•••Started 3mos agoActive 1 day ago

Should the federal government nationalize the electric grid to upgrade infrastructure and prevent regional blackouts?

The US electric grid is a fractured network primarily operated by profit-seeking private companies, local municipalities, and regional cooperatives. Proponents of a federal takeover argue that eliminating the profit motive would lower consumer bills, prevent deadly blackouts caused by neglected maintenance, and rapidly accelerate a nationwide green energy transition. Opponents counter that nationalizing the grid would cost taxpayers trillions, stifle private sector technological innovation, and create a centralized federal bureaucracy that is painfully slow to fix local power outages.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 66.2k America voters.

70%
Yes
30%
No
63%
Yes
22%
No
5%
Yes, energy is a human right and profit-driven corporate monopolies have proven they cannot maintain a reliable grid.
3%
No, but the government should cap utility profits and strictly enforce rigorous national reliability standards.
3%
Yes, a unified federal grid is the prerequisite to efficiently distributing renewable energy across the country.
3%
No, grid management is a local issue that must remain under the sovereign control of individual states.
2%
No, a bloated federal bureaucracy would stifle the grid innovation driven by free market competition.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 66.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 66.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDTDZ3N from Michigan  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but make it so that when taxing people, you don't do it so severely that you make almost the whole population poor.

 @BBYXDX4 from New York  answered…3mos3MO

while I think the government needs to insure that everyone has access to electricity, I think if the government nationalizes they wont be successful in doing it.

 @BCNXQ9Y from Tennessee  answered…3mos3MO

No, but it should incentivize the upgrade of the electric grid

 @BF48MGN from Minnesota  answered…3 days3D

Yes, along with a broad coalition of involved citizens.

 @BF46D8X from Alabama  answered…3 days3D

Nationalization of the grid would not prevent blackouts. This question makes no sense.

 @BF43J2V from Louisiana  answered…3 days3D

local governments should own their local utilities

 @BF425B8 from North Dakota  answered…3 days3D

Yes, if it really needs it

 @BF3N32X from Texas  answered…4 days4D

Rather than full nationalization, there should be federal funding for grid modernization, stronger national reliability standards, faster permitting for transmission lines, better coordination between regional grids, and incentives for utilities to upgrade infrastructure.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies

About This Data

Based on 66.2k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should the federal government nationalize the electric grid to upgrade infrastructure and prevent regional blackouts?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 22, 2026, from https://www.isidewith.com/poll/5557992597

Embed The Live Result

Preview