Should ballot measures that require supermajority votes in the future also have to earn the same supermajority to pass now?
This amendment changes how future ballot initiatives are approved in California when they propose to require a supermajority (e.g., two-thirds or three-fifths) vote for certain government actions. Proponents argue it ensures fairness and consistency. Opponents argue it makes it harder for voters to limit taxes or spending in the future.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
State
Zipcode
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 9.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 9.4k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 9.4k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.





