Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?
It’s not unconstitutional. We promise freedom for all. Refusing to do so for LGBTQIA individuals is…
Oh wow, we’ve got ourselves a constitutional scholar and a moral philosopher all in one!
Truly, what an honor to witness such an eloquent and well-reasoned argument, delivered with all the grace of a drunk guy yelling outside a gas station at 3 AM.
Let’s unpack this masterpiece of logic:
“Freedom of religion, huh?”
Yes, let’s talk about that! See, actual freedom of religion means everyone gets to live according to their own beliefs, not just yours. The Founders didn’t establish a Bible fan club, they created a secular government where religious freedom applies to everyone, not just people who agree with you. Shocking, I know.
“Founders never supported homosexuals.”
The Founders also never supported air conditioning, the internet, or people with your level of grammar attempting public debate, and yet, here we are. Also, if we're using 18th-century moral codes, hope you’re okay with giving up electricity, voting rights for non-landowners, and medical science.
“Jesus said a relationship is between 1 man and 1 woman.”
Jesus also hung out with the poor, the outcasts, and preached about love, humility, and not being a judgmental jerk. But sure, let’s cherry-pick scripture to justify being sanctimonious. Classic move.
“Being a homosexual is sad and shameful.”
You know what’s actually sad? Writing a whole essay about how other people’s happiness offends you while pretending you’re doing it out of morality. The only thing shameful here is this desperate need to police relationships that don’t involve you.
“Gays and lesbians and trans shouldn’t have children.”
Ah, yes, because straight people are doing such a flawless job at raising kids. No abuse, no neglect, no broken homes. Just perfect, morally superior heterosexuals raising only well-adjusted, perfect citizens. Got it.
“Need morals to or be straight or single.”
Ah yes, the "morality is reserved for straight people" argument, brought to you by someone who just used Jesus to justify discrimination. Bold strategy.
Look, if your entire moral code collapses the second someone else finds happiness in a way that doesn’t personally affect you, that says a lot more about you than it does about them. Maybe instead of worrying about how other people live their lives, you could spend some time learning what actual freedom is.
Or at the very least, a basic grammar lesson.
Trending News
Here are the top political news stories for today.
3 Replies
@B636G7G 12mos12MO
I wouldnt have a problem with the LGBTQ if they would not march and force their illness on others trying to rub it in our faces, and getting schools to enforce teaching this illness to young kids, thats a brainwashing tactic, its not enough for these people to get married now they march being vulgar and discusting in public and think its funny, then go protest with terrorist simpathizers chanting down with america, they would be stoned by these same people if not in America, these marriages should be resended and all these ill people should be locked up, just like rapists when wires are crossed so bad it cant be fixed you get rid of it. How do you like my grammar...
@12porgs6mos6MO
Firstly, this is all one sentence, the grammar is horrible. Secondly, there is something called the first amendment, in which people are allowed to protest, and speak freely. To talk about protesting some more, there wouldn't be a need if idiots just shut up (and violence against them stopped) with their stupid arguments and just let them have the right to same-sex marriage, among other LGBTQIA+ rights.
You can call it a disease or illness, but it isn't. People must at least be told in school about the LGBTQIA+ community so that it is accepted, so that violence will subside. If people are not taught, they will never understand, and thus there will just be more ignorance in the world.
@B7V3L3T8mos8MO
More conversations
Join in on more popular conversations.





