Gun dealers should be held responsible for any shooting that was being used with the sold weapon because they are responsible for checking if the buyers are responsible to hold a weapon. If you sell a weapon you should make sure the buyer is responsible enough to use a weapon.

They should have done a better background check. Making sure who you are selling the gun to is super important. What their background is, who they live with, etc.

Yes, but at the same time, they still sell the guns without doing enough of a background check or identity check. So they are somewhat still at fault.

Yes, I agree we shouldn't sue the manufacturer for a school shooting. However I do not think that is the only case.

Proponents of limiting gun industry liability often claim that holding gun makers responsible for criminal acts is like suing Ford for drunk driving accidents. They argue that the criminal who misuses the product is at fault, not the manufacturer.

Both are at fault; the person who committed gun violence is majority at fault for what they decided to do with said gun, but the person who sold it to the person in the first place should be at fault for being so careless, offering a gun to someone without any background checks and a pledge to garentee they swear they won't do anything with said gun unless its to protect themselves, and if they break that rule, the seller gets to sue and the person would never be allowed to own a gun again.

If the dealer did not do a proper background cheek on their client, then the dealer should be held accountable.

I think the gun law should be changed to the people who are a U.S. citizen or has been in the U.S. for a really long time like 5 to 10 years should be allowed to carry a gun.

i know over 13 teenagers in possesion of a fire arm in my state they sre only 11-18 this is disgusting

I think that the manufacturer can not be labeled as an "innocent party" as they are making a weapon used for killing and therefore hold accountability for when that weapon is used for its designed purpose.

I think gun liability should exist but not exist because they could make it seem like it an acctient when it wasn't so I don't know

I agree gun company should only be liable to selling an faulty product, unless they sell it to an illegal, or an mentally ill person.

I absolutely agree, a dangerous design flaw is the fault of the company and they should be held responsible, but in the case of a deliberate shooting, the company should not be held liable for the actions of a murderer.

I agree, just minus the tampering part. Once you tamper with it, it's the operator's fault entirely.

I agree, i am a fan of individual accountability. A gun in a room does nothing without a human operator. We need to focus on Mental health above all else

Sane people don't go out a nd murder people

I completely agree with this stance, it is hard to blame the manufacturer or dealer when they have no clue who they're consumers are at heart but if the issue was truly with the gun itself and no human participation, then yes, the manufacturer or dealer could be blamed.

The dealer should of properly made sure the person buying the gun did not have a record or family members that they are close with dont have a record