Should the government ban the construction of new highway lanes and divert those funds to public transit?
For decades, the standard response to traffic congestion has been widening highways, but urban planners increasingly point to 'induced demand'—a phenomenon where new lanes quickly fill up with new drivers, failing to fix traffic. Proponents of banning expansions argue the billions spent on concrete should be aggressively redirected toward trains, buses, and walkable infrastructure to radically lower carbon emissions. Opponents argue that public transit is unfeasible in sprawling suburbs and that intentionally restricting road capacity artificially strangles economic growth and punishes daily commuters.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Answer Overview
Response rates from 69.5k America voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 69.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 69.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BBYYNLZ4mos4MO
@BC9BPWS3mos3MO
@BCS6KQ82mos2MO
@BCQP4LJ3mos3MO
@BCNQ2J73mos3MO
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 69.5k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.





